Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
Powerful links
The Great "I"
Advanced Thinking
Promethea
The Third Age of the World.
Just do it.
More consistently solid thinking.
Theory
and application.
"Rights", The Bad Con
Sign...or not.
Just say "no".
Declaration of Individual Independence
The
Voluntaryist
Lysander Spooner
Bugging out.
Examining chaos.
"Anybody wanting a
piece of me without
my consent can come
back tomorrow and
go to the end of
the line. I gladly
accept your
requirement to be
treated likewise."
--jomama
Blog Search Engine
You are here: http://jomama.tblog.com
More ornery blogs
John Lopez
Billy Beck
Loose Cannon
Gabriel Mihalache
Drizzten
Fred rants
Bill St. Clair
Other fine sites
Nexialist News
Simmering frogs.
Classic essays etc.
Who owns you?
Reasoning for Rational Anarchism
The Granfalloon
Part of a short work of fiction. (See Chaps. 7-12)
I won't.
Hit counter
November 19, 2004
17085
add this to your site
Where are visitors to this page?
|
| It's about time. |
| 11.10.04 (11:25 am) [edit] |
"In the end we see that the Einstein spacetime
formalism is demonstrably wrong, and that the
evidence against it was available even before the
Einsteins put forward their fundamental
assumptions that later became the foundations of
twentieth century physics. Essentially the whole
Einstein formalism has all the hallmarks of
another system of 'epicycles' - when finally we
understand what is going on the whole construct
evaporates, just as Ptolemy's epicycles did when
it was realised that they were entirely a
consequence of not separating a measurement
protocol from the phenomena it was meant to
measure. In the case of Ptolemy it was finally
realised that the Earth was itself undergoing
motion. In the case of the Einstein formalism we
finally understand that the rods and clocks used
to define and implement measurements of motion
are actually affected by motion through the
quantum foam that is space, a view that predated
the Einsteins and is now seen to be correct.
All of these developments and the clearing away
of epicycle descriptions lead us back to very
challenging notions about the nature of time and
the deep connectivity and processing that is
reality, a connectivity that was evident in some
aspects of the quantum theory, but which was
essentially outside of the non-process paradigm.
This new physics is seen to be panexperientialist
in character in which a primitive self-awareness
or 'consciousness' is foundational to reality in
the manner argued by Griffen and others [5], a
consciousness that appears to be intrinsic to the
semantic nature of the information system that is
process physics. Such notions it seems may well
be moving into the realm of experimental science
and will result in a unification of human
knowledge and experience that is beyond our
prevailing comprehensions."
Oops, another mistake. They're poppin' up
everywhere, aren't they.
Keep your eyes and ears open, boys and girls.
The ride is gonna be wild.
The nature of time is that it's a purely human
construct. Why the hell would an infinite
universe care about time?
Reginald T. Cahill, Process Physics: From Information Theory to Quantum Space and Matter
|
|
|
| |
posted by: Marleen (reply)
post date: 03.26.06 (9:13 am)
You Gotcha one of the nicest blogs I have seen.
|
|
