 Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
Powerful links
The Great "I"
Advanced Thinking
Promethea
The Third Age of the World.
Just do it.
More consistently solid thinking.
Theory
and application.
"Rights", The Bad Con
Sign...or not.
Just say "no".
Declaration of Individual Independence
The
Voluntaryist
Lysander Spooner
Bugging out.
Examining chaos.
"Anybody wanting a
piece of me without
my consent can come
back tomorrow and
go to the end of
the line. I gladly
accept your
requirement to be
treated likewise."
--jomama
Blog Search Engine
You are here: http://jomama.tblog.com
More ornery blogs
John Lopez
Billy Beck
Loose Cannon
Gabriel Mihalache
Drizzten
Fred rants
Bill St. Clair
Other fine sites
Nexialist News
Simmering frogs.
Classic essays etc.
Who owns you?
Reasoning for Rational Anarchism
The Granfalloon
Part of a short work of fiction. (See Chaps. 7-12)
I won't.
Hit counter
November 19, 2004
17085
add this to your site

Where are visitors to this page?
|
| The Blessed Community. |
| 09.30.04 (8:42 pm) [edit] |
"The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is mandatory. According to Section 221, persons who do not respond shall be fined not more than $100. The U.S. Census Bureau may use this information only for statistical purposes. We can assure you that your confidentiality is protected. Title 13 requires the Census Bureau to keep all information about you and all other respondents strictly confidential. Any Census Bureau employee who violates these provisions is subject to a fine of up to $250,000 or a prison sentence of up to five years, or both."
The Divine Comedy continues.
Bwahahahahahahah.
I doubt you're gonna wanna read all this crap.
If you're like me, it'll give you hives.
|
|
|
| |
| Making more enemies |
| 09.30.04 (7:45 pm) [edit] |
"Militant pro-hunt groups are targeting Labour MPs and government ministers in a growing campaign of abuse, threats and intimidation over the decision to ban hunting...
An MP had a large lump of concrete thrown through his constituency office window while the private homes of three MPs have also been targeted."
The Controllers working hard at making more enemies.
What's the logical outcome of that?
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| The ever present paradoxes |
| 09.30.04 (9:29 am) [edit] |
This just in from my bro, purportedly written by a man I think highly of.... _________________________ _
"The paradox of our time in history is that we have taller buildings but shorter tempers, wider freeways, but narrower viewpoints. We spend more, but have less, we buy more, but enjoy less. We have bigger houses and smaller families, more conveniences, but less time. We have more degrees but less sense, more knowledge, but less judgment, more experts, yet more problems, more medicine, but less wellness. We drink too much, smoke too much, spend too recklessly, laugh too little, drive too fast, get too angry, stay up too late, get up too tired, read too little, watch TV too much, and pray too seldom. We have multiplied our possessions, but reduced our values. We talk too much, love too seldom, and hate too often. We've learned how to make a living, but not a life. We've added years to life not life to years. We've been all the way to the moon and back, but have trouble crossing the street to meet a new neighbor. We conquered outer space but not inner space. We've done larger things, but not better things. We've cleaned up the air, but polluted the soul. We've conquered the atom, but not our prejudice. We write more, but learn less. We plan more, but accomplish less. We've learned to rush, but not to wait. We build more computers to hold more information, to produce more copies, but we communicate less and less. These are the times of fast foods and slow digestion, big men and small character, steep profits and shallow relationships. These are the days of two incomes but more divorce, fancier houses, but broken homes. These are days of quick trips, disposable diapers, throwaway morality, one night stands, overweight bodies, and pills that do everything from cheer, to quiet, to kill. It is a time when there is much in the showroom window and nothing in the stockroom. A time when technology can bring this letter to you, and a time when you can choose either to share this insight, or to just hit delete. Remember, spend some time with your loved ones, because they are not going to be around forever. Remember, say a kind word to someone who looks up to you in awe, because that little person soon will grow up and leave your side. Remember, to give a warm hug to the one next to you, because that is the only treasure you can give with your heart and it doesn't cost a cent. Remember, to say, 'I love you' to your partner and your loved ones, but most of all mean it. A kiss and an embrace will mend hurt when it comes from deep inside of you. Remember to hold hands and cherish the moment for someday that person will not be there again. Give time to love, give time to speak, and give time to share the precious thoughts in your mind. AND ALWAYS REMEMBER: Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away. If you don't send this to at least 8 people....who cares?"
George Carlin
|
|
|
| |
| Universal humiliation. |
| 09.29.04 (7:07 pm) [edit] |
Damn. Been goin' all day tryin' to get inspired to find something for mah blog and I found this...
"Humiliating to human pride as it may be, we must recognize that the advance and even the preservation of civilization are dependent upon a maximum of opportunity for accidents to happen." -- F.A. Hayek
Could that be because we don't have the mental capacity to plan squat?
Or could it be that the Universe doesn't allow planning?
Neither would I expect more than one in a thousand hyumans to admit to such inadequacy.
But I buy Hayek's idea. Howbouchou?
|
|
|
| |
| Next the stars? |
| 09.28.04 (6:42 am) [edit] |
Two visionaries, Branson and Rutan, gonna just do it.
Cheers, guys.
"By the end of the decade, Virgin Galactic - the most exciting development in the story of modern space history - is planning to make it possible for almost anyone to visit the final frontier at an affordable price."
Check it out.
|
|
|
| |
| The Spud Car |
| 09.27.04 (6:52 am) [edit] |
"Toyota's latest environmentally friendly concept car is made from potatoes.
Rear bumpers, trims and mats in the ES3 prototype hatchback are built from a plastic derived from a natural acid in sweet potatoes. The organically formed substance is perfectly biodegradable as well as being as tough as conventional materials.
A spokesman for the car firm told the Daily Mirror: "It's proven science and environmentally kinder. Eco-plastic has enormous potential."
Toyotas made using potatoes are being introduced in Japan and may soon be launched in the UK." - Ananova.com
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=29& art_id=iol1096107279397S1 30" title="http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=29& art_id=iol1096107279397S1 30" target="_blank"http://www.iol.co.za/index.ph...
|
|
|
| |
| The Ruling Concept |
| 09.26.04 (3:17 pm) [edit] |
"In the meantime, one wonders if there is a modern Joseph Welch among us who can speak truth to power and, in so doing, restore to us the sanity that is essential to the health of any living system. That such a person resides within each of us is a thought that we too easily dismiss. We have been too long conditioned to believe in the rationality and goodness of political leaders, regarding the shortcomings of the system as nothing more than a failure of technique, not of the character of its officials. In the 1996 words of Arthur Miller:
Few of us can easily surrender our belief that society must somehow make sense. The thought that the state has lost its mind is intolerable. And so the evidence has to be internally denied."
Looks to me like a failure of The Ruling Concept rather than the characters on stage.
What do you think?
Full essay.
|
|
|
| |
| How are you wired? |
| 09.26.04 (8:28 am) [edit] |
"Men have been taught that the highest virtue is not to achieve, but to give. Yet one cannot give that which has not been created. Creation comes before distribution- or there will be nothing to distribute. The need of the creator comes before the need of any possible beneficiary. Yet we are taught to admire the second-hander who dispenses gifts he has not produced above the man who made the gifts possible. We praise an act of charity. We shrug at an act of achievement." -- Ayn Rand
Some people intuitively understand this. Some never will.
I take issue with the phrase "need of the creator". That implies at least support in what he's doing.
A creator needs nothing more than to be left alone to do it.
|
|
|
| |
| Tell me this ain't heavy |
| 09.25.04 (3:57 pm) [edit] |
"Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps; for he is the only animal that is struck by the difference between what things are and what they might have been." -- William Hazlitt
Yea, this grabs me, bigtime.
Is this our major weakness?
But why not get over it and move on?
|
|
|
| |
| Powerful motivators |
| 09.24.04 (4:50 pm) [edit] |
"There is a powerful craving in most of us to see ourselves as instruments in the hands of others and thus free ourselves from the responsibility for acts which are prompted by our own questionable inclinations and impulses. Both the strong and the weak grasp at this alibi. The latter hide their malevolence under the virtue of obedience: they acted dishonorably because they had to obey orders. The strong, too, claim absolution by proclaiming themselves the chosen instrument of a higher power- God, history, fate, nation or humanity." -- Eric Hoffer
Seen any that fit this description?
|
|
|
| |
| The Divine Comedy |
| 09.24.04 (8:38 am) [edit] |
I've got a coupla pontificators in the comments section, tryin' hard to "show me the way, the truth, and the light" so I'm gonna talk about fallacies and stupidity again.
First of all, discussing ideas with guys like Devlin, is, to paraphrase Orwell, like playing chess with a guy who all of a sudden jumps up and accuses you of commiting adultery with his wife.
I've said this before:
I don't know shit.
That in itself puts me far ahead of the pontificators, the Purveyors of The Truth, whatever the fuck that means to anyone at any given moment. The truth, the way most of us use it, is a shape shifter.
Why should you trust what I or anyone else say, unless it "rings" in your soul? Then try to test it with deductive logic, if you know how. Most don't even think of checking the premises of their logic when they find a contradiction. And the overwhelming majority of what we hear/read is opinion, without any reference to a real fact- based process. Bald assertions with faulty premises yield faulty conclusions. Faulty premises alone yield faulty conclusions.
That's the social world we live in. We have a good start on the technological side due to the efforts of a few folks with some thinking abilities and the guts to try new shit.
We all, I'm convinced, act on assumptions and guesses based on probabilities.
Oh yea, there's truth to be known, but I expect, as a race, we've got thousands of years more of our mental evolution to get even a glimpse of it. The "truth" I'm thinking of here is a firm grasp of the method of getting along with each other without resorting to beating someone else over the head or lying to get it.
Why do I say this?
The Emotionally-Derived Belief System is in play and has been since about the time God invented dirt. [Can any o' you Bright Sparks out there tell me what's contradictory about that sentence?] Do you see any evidence that The EDBS is about to go away soon?
Alan Carter appears to have most of it right when he says there are two kinds of thinking, the deductive [rule-based] and the intuitive [guess- based]. He goes on to say that our ability to accomplish the deductive side of it is rarely effective. I say that's because we are usually lousy observers, don't give a shit about rule- based logic, and don't focus well for anymore than a few minutes, if at all. And what we do better than anything is lie to ourselves.
Am I wrong?
So what does this tell us about even attempting the intuitive thinking if we can't accomplish-- with any accuracy--the deductive part? How do we then test our guesses?
Do we really live long enough to produce any more than Divine Comedy?
I used to think we didn't have the genes to even approach intelligence. A lot of the switches aren't working I told myself...or were missing.
Now I think it's the lack of longevity, which may be gene related. A few folks have said we have 4,000 genetic defects and I doubt any of those defects cover the mental ones.
Too many questions...too many distractions...not enough time and a shitpot full of "answers" that ain't worth the powder to blow 'em up with.
Guess you're just gonna hafta do it yourself...the thinking part.
And this ain't the whole story here.
Have you ever seen The Whole Story?
Let me know when you have.
And now that I painted this grim picture does that mean we should give up?
Hell, no. Why not just do something, even if it's wrong...especially if it's wrong...and be ready to straighten up the possible mess later.
Isn't that what progress is all about?
I'm just here to provide a few possible clues to progress.
Why take me or anyone else seriously?
Aren't we all part of the Divine Comedy?
P.S. And when I want a guru to tell me how the Universe works, how/what I oughta think about it and fit with it, I'll put out a help wanted ad.
|
|
|
| |
| Looking from outside the fishbowl. |
| 09.23.04 (11:02 am) [edit] |
"The meaning of economic freedom is this: that the individual is in a position to choose the way in which he wants to integrate himself into the totality of society." -- Ludwig von Mises
|
|
|
| |
| Why some decide to be poor and some not. |
| 09.22.04 (2:23 pm) [edit] |
From a previous commentary by Devlin...
"The reason most people are poor is because that is the nature of the rationing systems we've had over the last 6000 years. Since weath as we think of it boils down to a claim on the labor of others, it follows that if some people are rich then a larger group of people must be poor." ______________________
Anyone that has looked at cellular automata would see why some simple rules (the essence of cellular automata) just continue to expand to increasing complexity, without apparent end...like my favorite fractal, the logarithmic spiral.
Why?
Who cares, and if I do, what do you think I can do to bust the trend? And you?...or was yours just an observation?
And if one of The Poor Lot in your example decides he wants to move to The Wealthy Lot, he might put together a plan to sell a number of The Wealthy Lot a product or service, moving himself out of The Poor Lot.
The wealthy are still wealthy but one of the poor has now joined them.
This poor vs. wealthy thing is not a zero sum game and I suspect we all get what we want on this planet. It's just that many never think much about what they really want, particularly when being poor requires little effort.
And so, they get what someone else wants for them.
Now, don't they still get what they want?
And when someone makes a claim to my labor, many times I say "no". Other times I say, "yes" if I like the odds.
So what's the big deal?
|
|
|
| |
| Firefox - over 1 million downloads |
| 09.22.04 (9:29 am) [edit] |
p2pnet.net News:- "The Mozilla Firefox browser promo team are feeling well chuffed.
They wanted a million downloads. And by 5:55 pm Pacific, they'd done it. With six days to go.
Now they're after two million.
'This is the fastest adoption rate we have ever experienced, higher than every previous Firefox release,' they say on their web page.
'But it's not time to relax our efforts. How soon can we break through 2 million?'
It won't be long, the way things are going.
'Bye, IE."
I've used Firefox for quite a while and Firebird before it.
I'm hooked.
It works with Mac, Linux and Windows.
Try it. I'll bet you'll like it.
http://p2pnet.net/story/2479" title="http://p2pnet.net/story/2479" target="_blank"http://p2pnet.net/story/2479
|
|
|
| |
| More media lies. |
| 09.21.04 (8:39 am) [edit] |
(CBS/AP) Within the next few days, CBS News expects to name an independent panel of experts to scrutinize its reporting of President Bush's National Guard service after its defenses for airing the explosive story crumbled.
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| The Royal Decree |
| 09.20.04 (10:32 am) [edit] |
"Outta the way! Outta the way!"
" 'The skin gets extremely hot, and people can't stand the pain, so they have to move - and move in the way we want them to,' said Col Wade Hall of the Office of Force Transformation, a body formed in November 2001 to promote rapid improvement across all of the American armed services.
"Improvement" to do what?
Rich Garcia, a spokesman for the Air Force Research Laboratory in New Mexico, where the systems were developed, took part in testing the weapon and was subjected to the microwave beam which has a range of one kilometre. 'It just feels like your skin is on fire,' he said. "[But] when you get out of the path of the beam, or shut off the beam, everything goes back to normal. There's no residual pain."
So...if The Controllers don't like where you're located, they'll just "heat" you up til ya move.
Sounds like a new twist on the ol' cattle prod.
But to every weapon there's a counter weapon.
What are they gonna do with the guys in the tin foil suits?
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| A word on The Creators. |
| 09.19.04 (11:37 am) [edit] |
"Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded- here and there, now and then- are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as 'bad luck.'" --Robert Heinlein
|
|
|
| |
| Googling locally. |
| 09.19.04 (7:50 am) [edit] |
"Google added a few flourishes of its own last week to its local search service, which lets people enter search terms such as 'dentists' or 'vegetarian pizza,' along with a Zip code or city name, to look up nearby businesses and Web pages.
The search site now automatically plots these merchants on a map and allows people to zoom around inside that diagram without having to reload the Web page -- something dial-up Internet users may appreciate.
Google Local first launched in trial form in March. The version released last week also indexes more Web pages, including personal home pages, blogs, and review and rating sites."
Go to local.google.com
Try it. You'll like it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3081 6-2004Sep18.html" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3081 6-2004Sep18.html" target="_blank"http://www.washingtonpost.com...
|
|
|
| |
| The Great "I". |
| 09.19.04 (2:08 am) [edit] |
"It is dark here. The flame of the candle stands still in the air. Nothing moves in this tunnel save our hand on the paper. We are alone here under the earth. It is a fearful word, alone. The laws say that none among men may be alone, ever and at any time, for this is the great transgression and the root of all evil. But we have broken many laws. And now there is nothing here save our one body, and it is strange to see only two legs stretched on the ground, and on the wall before us the shadow of our one head."
The Great "I".
|
|
|
| |
| Is cardiology ready for revolution? |
| 09.18.04 (4:20 am) [edit] |
Based on what my bro sent me in an email today I decided to google "Chlamydia pneumoniae" and I found this. _________________________ ____
"Recent animal studies reinforce evidence found in test-tubes during 1997 where different groups from Canada, USA and Finland have shown that C. pneumoniae invades arterial tissues.28-31
In these studies researchers infected a dozen rabbits through the nose and within seven weeks of contracting the organism, the majority of them developed arterial plaques. This plaque formation occurred despite the fact that rabbits do not normally get atherosclerosis, even when they are fed high-fat diets."
All the details.
|
|
|
| |
| 1+1=3 |
| 09.17.04 (11:47 am) [edit] |
More from the link on the previous blog... and thanks to Devlin.
The title to this blog was not done as a joke. After you read the clip below, can you tell me why I chose it? Maybe I'm being too cryptic, but I gotta know.
This little piece from the online book at the link below is nothing more than a minute sample of some very clear thinking and writing.
I'll be putting the link in the panel on the left side of my blog. _________________________ __________
"...we can do two kinds of thinking. One way follows rules, and is pretty easy to do. The other way uses guesses based on experience and is harder to learn. People who do science sometimes call the rule following way "deductive thinking" and the guessing way "inductive thinking". All the good stuff in science comes from people who have done inductive thinking, for the simple reason that deductive thinking can never discover new things. All it can do is rearrange stuff that we already know. That does not mean that deductive thinking is unimportant though, because we would never have got anywhere in science without it. It's deductive thinking that lets us grind through what we already know, applying it is useful ways and finding things that we haven't yet understood while we are at it. Deductive thinking also lets us test the guesses that come from inductive thinking - which can sometimes be wrong and are no use at all until they have been tested. That's why really effective people are usually good at doing both kinds of thinking at once. When we do both kinds at once, we can find the holes in our existing understanding, cook up guesses to fill in the holes, and test the guesses in a unified kind of fluid thinking that cannot be put into words until it is done and the results are available."
Does inductive thinking come from a connection, a view, or better yet, a feeling of quantum space?
I highly recommend the whole megillah.
|
|
|
| |
| The economic and warfare cycle |
| 09.16.04 (4:32 pm) [edit] |
"The cycle starts in a state of economic collapse, where the relatively low level of ritualised behaviour enables creative and energetic people to start economic activity and make progress. As material wealth grows, the level of ritualism within the society grows with it. [Institutionalism* is born.] Pretty soon the population need more ritual than they can get by repeating productive behaviours, and are drifting off into a self-aggrandising and delusional state of mind. So they start having meetings, administrating themselves, performing rituals which can be repeated more often than anything involving the inertia of real material wealth. At this point the population is in a state very similar to cocaine addiction. So it's hardly surprising that as material productivity begins to reduce, they start fuelling their ritualism with credit, and taking totalitarian measures to suppress dissent. [Super Institutionalism.] Eventually, economic collapse occurs, and at the peak of their boredom addiction and introspective inability to deal with reality, the population find themselves suddenly deprived of boring rituals. At these times, the population find a simultaneous outlet for the aggressive emotions caused by withdrawal and also a source of comforting ritualised behaviour, by demonising those who are not exactly like themselves. They start marching and add war to economic collapse. It is at these times that the presence of people who are good at manipulating herds of demented, semi-conscious humans can do great damage. [Glorious Leaders of Great Institutions, i.e. nations, are crowned.] Then the cycle starts again."
As I've said, aren't we hamsters running round and round in our cages doing the same dumb shit over and over again?
Why?
*In case you're new here, I define Institutionalism as 2 or more folks looking for enemies.
http://www.reciprocality.org/thirdage/chapter2.html#adhd" title="http://www.reciprocality.org/thirdage/chapter2.html#adhd" target="_blank"http://www.reciprocality.org/...
|
|
|
| |
| Hail to the Chief |
| 09.16.04 (11:16 am) [edit] |
Press: Castro conquers Ivan [The actual headline in the BBC link below]
Yea, and wet streets cause rain and Fidel drove the beast off...like The Schrub defeated Iraq...
"In Havana, the close shave that Cuba experienced as Hurricane Ivan passed by dominates the country's two daily newspapers."
Hail to the Glorious Saviors, all hell...er, hail!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3658410.stm" title="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3658410.stm" target="_blank"http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/am...
|
|
|
| |
| Crank up the party, boys 'n girls. We're goin' out in style. |
| 09.16.04 (8:10 am) [edit] |
"These are not sums, but present-value figures, heavily discounted to show in today's dollars what it would cost to pay off the debt immediately. The International Monetary Fund estimates the gap at $47 trillion, the Brookings Institution at $60 trillion.
'To give you idea how big the problem is,' said Laurence Kotlikoff, economics chairman at Boston University, who has written extensively on the subject, to close a $51 trillion fiscal gap, 'you'd have to have an immediate and permanent 78 percent hike in the federal income tax.'"
Seems only fitting to sell this politician created debt at maybe 5 to 10 cents on the dollar and send them and their minions home to get honest work.
It'll never happen.
Are you ready for the consequences?
..and this just in...
"WASHINGTON (AP) -- With little debate, House lawmakers on Tuesday included themselves as part of a pay raise that all federal employees will receive next year.
The cost-of-living raise would be the sixth straight for members of the House and Senate, boosting the salaries of lawmakers, now $158,100, by about $4,000 in the new calendar year."
About the debt.
About those who don't give a shit about it.
|
|
|
| |
| Bad thoughts |
| 09.16.04 (2:36 am) [edit] |
"'The Motive Fallacy is so common in politics that serious policy debate is almost non- existent'. The problem is that politicians probably know exactly what they are doing, but continue to do it anyway."
Book review
|
|
|
| |
| A polite society |
| 09.15.04 (12:02 pm) [edit] |
Shouldn't guns be outlawed for people in ´official´ positions, i.e. pols, cops, military, bureaucrats...anybody on the taxpayers´ payroll?
Then watch how polite all the above fucks and everyone else gets.
And whoever else wants to, should be 'packin', without hindrance of any kind by anybody.
Then watch the terrorism virtually disappear.
An acquaintance once asked his friend, an ex-Soviet General, why the Soviets never had a plan to invade the US.
The General said, "Americans had too many guns."
|
|
|
| |
| Those pesky flies following you around. |
| 09.15.04 (8:01 am) [edit] |
"What amazes me is that they [True Believers]like to set themselves up as having a slightly finer sensibility than you or me but in fact they are completely intellectually irresponsible. They used to come up with very bad arguments for their faiths but at least they felt that there was something they should provide. Now mere wilfulness has triumphed. This is what I describe as the egocentric approach to truth. You are no longer interested in reality because to do that you have to be pretty rigorous, you have to have evidence or do some experimentation. Rather, beliefs are part of your wardrobe. You've got a style and how dare anybody tell you that your style isn't right. Ideology is seen as simply a matter of taste and as it's not right to tell people that they've got bad taste, so it's not right to tell them that their opinions are false. I'm afraid that the cast of mind of most people is the opposite of scientific."
The full interview.
|
|
|
| |
| Blasting to Bliss Eternal |
| 09.15.04 (5:00 am) [edit] |
"But after 80 years of putative Enlightenment, the descendants of John Scopes's tormenters have concocted a new level of silliness that would render Mencken speechless: end-times religion for export by the military force of the United States Government. According to this vision, sending cannon fodder to die in heathen Babylon is a good thing because a spreading Middle East war will hasten the Apocalypse: whereupon the scapulae of the faithful will sprout wings lofting them into Bliss Eternal while infidels will be consumed in the fiery furnace." --unknown
Jeez.
It ain't my planet.
I'm just passin' thru.
|
|
|
| |
| Evolution, Part II |
| 09.14.04 (2:37 pm) [edit] |
"The most important institutions in human society -- language, law, money, and markets -- all developed spontaneously, without central direction." --David Boaz
This statement is obvious to anyone who has studied just a little history.
Let's examine that concept 'without central direction' for a moment.
The State is a treatise that describes how it theoretically started...by conquest. The wandering looters decided to 'set up shop' and save themselves a lotta headache. One gets to a certain age and says, "There's gotta be a better way. Hey, guys, why don't we just sit down here and collect a percentage for protection from other guys like us rather than this constant travel. I'm tired of bein' constantly on the move. It really sucks."
And so started the end of the natural evolution of law, language, money and markets...but only for a while.
Now jump ahead quite a few years.
The 'authorities' think they now have control of all that. They've gone way beyond simple protection. There was more to get.
Let's look at the evidence that denys it:
1-The Language Police (the Spanish and French) show no success in their endeavors at control of 'their' languages. That anyone would even bother is nothing more than hubris.
2-Law is made by anyone that has a mind to. (see Bush, the judges and lawyers telling jurors what the law is...doing as they please.)
3-The currency markets are now uncontrollable by central banks...even in concert...for any period of time. The currency market (Forex) is the largest in the world, trading over $1.2 trillion in digits representing money every day. Forex accounts for more volume in one day than the NYSE does in a month. (see http://tinyurl.com/6mv4l)
4-No matter how hard authorities are interesting in controlling the drug market, they aren't succeding, for only one example.
Back to evoluton, Part II...without central direction.
|
|
|
| |
| Those comforting flies |
| 09.13.04 (11:39 am) [edit] |
"Every man, wherever he goes, is encompassed by a cloud of comforting convictions, which move with him like flies on a summer day." -- Bertrand Russell
I brush the dead ones off my shoulders periodically.
How about you?
|
|
|
| |
| More on accountability. |
| 09.12.04 (11:01 am) [edit] |
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong." -- Thomas Sowell
Seen any that fit this description lately?
Let's look at the other side of the coin.
When you make your own decisions, the decisions that effect only your own life, to whom do you have to be accountable? And if those decisions affect others in your life?
Why would you even want to lay those decisions off on someone else?
Do they know better how to live your life than you do?
And once you lay off those decisions, how can you rightfully be pissed off when those decisions are not made to your liking?
|
|
|
| |
| Some are running for office. |
| 09.12.04 (10:43 am) [edit] |
A number of pontificators have shown up in the comments recently. You know, those without some reasons or examples to back up their statements.
As a friend who taught logic lessons once said, "It can't be taught. You either have it or you don't."
I expect he's right.
What's been your experience?
|
|
|
| |
| Another paradox for your collection. |
| 09.11.04 (9:37 am) [edit] |
"The great crimes of the twentieth century were committed not by money-grubbing capitalists but by dedicated idealists. Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler were contemptuous of money. The passage from the nineteenth to the twentieth century has been a passage from considerations of money to considerations of power. How naive the cliche that money is the root of evil!" -- Eric Hoffer
...and how naive just about everyone is about it.
|
|
|
| |
| The free mind. |
| 09.10.04 (9:31 am) [edit] |
"This I believe: that the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world. And this I would fight for: the freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected. And this I must fight against: any idea, religion, or government which limits or destroys the individual." -- John Steinbeck
|
|
|
| |
| Wolves and sheep. |
| 09.09.04 (3:03 pm) [edit] |
"It is useless for sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion." -- William Ralph Inge
Do you see what he means?
Think about it.
|
|
|
| |
| Have you been "federated" yet? |
| 09.09.04 (9:42 am) [edit] |
Fortress Big Apple, Revisited
"Of course, in communities of color and poor neighborhoods, such tactics, and worse, are old hat -- as my cell-mates behind the arraignment courtroom were quick to point out. But now the NYPD is field-testing new tactics and tools to use against us all. Perhaps most distressing, they've established a precedent and the tacit acceptance of the public as well. Most New Yorkers either left town or failed to vigorously protest the chilling effect of the growth of the homeland-security complex.
I heard first hand of seemingly baseless preemptive arrests and intimidation by federal agents -- an activist en route to work grabbed off the street by the feds; another apparently tailed by a black SUV and shadowed by plainclothes agents. The question is: Will this stop now that the RNC has left town or will it simply become the accepted way of doing things in New York City and elsewhere around the country?"
The entire story.
|
|
|
| |
| The whole planet...at night. |
| 09.08.04 (5:04 pm) [edit] |
A look at the world at night...
http://atimes01.atimes.com/atimes/images/earth_n ight.jpg" title="http://atimes01.atimes.com/atimes/images/earth_n ight.jpg" target="_blank"http://atimes01.atimes.com/at...
|
|
|
| |
| Wikipedia 'to make universities obsolete' |
| 09.08.04 (11:21 am) [edit] |
"For most web surfers, the Wikipedia is simply an occasionally useful online resource that needs to be taken with a huge sackful of salt. For others, it's a poor excuse for a real encylopedia. But for its proponents, it's nothing short of revolutionary! It's Emergent[*], you see.
A column by veteran tech writer Al Fasoldt has provoked some furious defenses of the site, in a similar spirit to the ones we received here recently. What they lack in coherence, they make up for in passion. And in the absence of decent Flame of the Week material recently, we hope this will provide the same vicarious thrills. Cash`n`Carrion
Taking to his scooter, one young Wiki-fiddler roars into action.
'Old World is under attack. The authority of the book, authority of the journalist, authority of the teacher, is under direct assault by Wikipedia and other online efforts,' claims the poster, "Stephen"."
Attacking the purveyors of the conventional and predictable set--in this case, the 'authority of the journalist'--will produce smoke eminating from these 'authorities' ears, huh?
If ya can't baffle 'em with bullshit, drown 'em in derision...the fear response. This journalist succeeded well in this.
See the rest of the conventional and predictable smoke come out of this journalist's ears.
|
|
|
| |
| The Big Bang has fizzled. |
| 09.08.04 (10:51 am) [edit] |
"1. Static universe models fit observational data better than expanding universe models. Static universe models match most observations with no adjustable parameters. The Big Bang can match each of the critical observations, but only with adjustable parameters, one of which (the cosmic deceleration parameter) requires mutually exclusive values to match different tests. [2,3] Without ad hoc theorizing, this point alone falsifies the Big Bang. Even if the discrepancy could be explained, Occam’s razor favors the model with fewer adjustable parameters— the static universe model."
The other 29 reasons for the fizzle.
|
|
|
| |
| What is The Truth? |
| 09.08.04 (8:08 am) [edit] |
There's been much talk about "truth" thru the ages and little discussion about finding and knowing the difference between it and error.
And unless we get some Divine Revelation--or somesuch--thrust on you and me, it doesn't look like much will change.
One of the best ways to judge this mushy concept known as "truth" is to ask yourself, "Does everyone know it?" ...as Goethe said. _________________________
"...the truth requires constant repetition because error is being preached about us all the time and not only by isolated individuals but by the masses. In newspapers and encyclopaedias, in schools, universities; everywhere error rides high and basks in the consciousness of having the majority on its side." --Goethe, 1828
|
|
|
| |
| Are you a Pobble? |
| 09.07.04 (3:05 am) [edit] |
"While the Pobble was in the water some unidentified creatures came and ate his toes off, and when he got home his aunt remarked: It's a fact the whole world knows, That Pobbles are happier without their toes, which is funny because it has a meaning, and one might even say a political significance. For the whole theory of authoritarian government is summed up in the statement that Pobbles are happier without their toes." -- George Orwell
|
|
|
| |
| Human advancement |
| 09.06.04 (11:31 am) [edit] |
"Human advancement is predicated on the human mind, its functioning design. Humans have traveled to the moon, taken a picture of the Sombrero Galaxy, successfully transplanted hearts, and have invented electric tooth brushes, which impresses people who are easily impressed, but human minds still perceive the utilization of force as a means to resolve contradictions despite the flawless proofs of ongoing history that the use of force resolves no contradictions, and always creates greater contradictions. Therein humans routinely use force to maliciously deny people their otherwise unalienable rights, deny non-harmful opportunities, bureaucratically harass them, prevent the asking of questions and impede the advancement of knowledge, imprison people, slaughter them in wars, and seize their assets to pay for more police, prisons, soldiers and bombs. Obviously the human mind is still as primitive as the Neanderthals who also could not figure out how to use the mind's designed ability to resolve human-caused contradictions."
The whole essay.
|
|
|
| |
| A Mad Hatter's tea party. |
| 09.05.04 (9:32 am) [edit] |
The Madness of Emperor George
"While 9/11 Commissions conduct their make- believe investigations and conclude that events of that day were produced by failures of intelligence, it is more to the point to suggest that there is a continuing 'failure of intelligence' in this country that has nothing to do with the CIA, FBI, NSA, or the Pentagon. Long before that deadly day of three years ago, the minds of most Americans had collapsed into a preoccupation with irrelevancies, trivia, and a continuing insistence upon being entertained. The idea that the intelligence of Americans might be energized to address problems which the political establishment prefers not to be recognized, has long been absent from social discourse. Even the Democratic and Republican conventions reflected this flight from thoughtfulness. The William F. Buckleys and Gore Vidals no longer exchanged thoughtful observations – and barbs – with one another as they had decades ago. Boobus electorus was now treated to the ruminations of Hollywood performers, rock musicians, country-western singers, and professional wrestlers!
Politics is a circus. The star performers are now rabid clowns.
To abandon one’s mind – along with the control and responsibility for one’s life that follows – is to collapse into madness. When done by enough people, the social effect is to turn a country into a Mad Hatter’s tea party, or worse. One saw reflections of this collective madness in the faces of airhead Republicans listening to Arnold Schwarzenegger, as he crowed from his perch about the alleged 'virtues' of President Bush, a 'leader who doesn’t flinch, who doesn’t waiver, who does not back down.' He failed to mention that such steadfastness was most pronounced when Bush’s house of lies and deceptions came crashing down, a quality Schwarzenegger would equate with 'inner strength,' but which could also be taken as evidence of paranoia."
Emperor Shrub, in a culmination of The Age of Institution,(2 or more folks looking for enemies) has sent reason into hiding or hadn't you noticed? But, hey, he had a lotta helping hands and, of course, you can lay that off on "the other guy". No one else will blame you for playing the blame game. Seems as most everybody plays it nowadays.
It doesn't look good for humans, does it?
Do you hear that screeching in the veldt?
They're calling us back.
Full article.
|
|
|
| |
| Ape vs. Man...Volatile DNA? |
| 09.05.04 (5:53 am) [edit] |
"Determining the genetic differences between humans and primates is important for several reasons, Dugaiczyk said, including advancing knowledge about how life developed and evolved on earth. Other benefits include making it easier to identifying human predisposition to genetic disease, by comparing humans with other primate species. A third possible benefit is to underline the importance of protecting endangered primate species."
Who's going to protect the endangered human species?
The rest of the report.
|
|
|
| |
| The Chinese finger trap |
| 09.04.04 (11:33 am) [edit] |
"Give evil nothing to oppose, and it will disappear by itself." (Tao Teh King, Chapter 60).
|
|
|
| |
| ...'round and 'round we go. |
| 09.04.04 (12:04 am) [edit] |
"Political history is largely an account of mass violence and of the expenditure of vast resources to cope with mythical fears and hopes." -- Murray Edelman
And yet on we go, like the hamsters whirling around in their cages.
|
|
|
| |
| In Praise of Chaos |
| 09.03.04 (6:56 pm) [edit] |
"People are so uncomfortable with chaos, in fact, that Newtonian science as interpreted by Laplace and others saw the underlying reality of the world as deterministic. If you knew the initial conditions you could predict the future far in advance. With a steady hand and the right cue tip, you could run the table in pool. Then came quantum mechanics, with uncertainty and indeterminism, which even Einstein refused to accept, saying 'God doesn't play dice.' Philosophically, Einstein couldn't believe in a universe with a sense of whimsy. He was afraid of the threatened return of chaos, preferring to believe for every effect there was a cause. A consequence of this was the notion that if you could control the cause, you could control the effect.
There may very well be much 'cause and effect' lying about. I just don't believe we have the genes to find it, not even the Einsteins.
Case in point: What is a scientist doing mucking about with supernatural beings rolling dice?
The modern proponents of law and order don't stop with the assertion that for every effect, there is a cause. And they also assert they 'know' the cause. We see this attitude reflected by social problem solvers, who proclaimed: 'The cause of famine in Ethiopia is lack of food in Ethiopia.' So we had rock crusades to feed the starving Ethiopians and ignored the role of the Ethiopian government. Other asserted: 'The case of drug abuse is the presence of drugs,' so they enacted a war on certain drugs which drove up their price, drove up the profit margins available to those who dealt in prohibited drugs, and created a criminal subclass who benefited from the prohibition. Psychologists assert: 'The reason this person is this way is because such- and-such happened in childhood, with parents, or siblings, or whatever.' So any evidence of abuse, trauma, or childhood molestation--which over time should assume a trivial role in one's life--are given infinite power by the financial needs of the psychotherapy business.
You may respond: 'Well, but these were just misidentified causes; there really is a cause.' Maybe so, and maybe not. Whatever story you tell yourself, you can't escape the fact that to you personally 'the future is a blinding mirage' (Stephen Vizinczey, The Rules of Chaos). You can't see the future precisely because you don't really know what's causing it. The myth of causality denies the role of Eris. Science eventually had to acknowledge the demon of serendipity, but not everyone is happy with that fact. The political world, in the cause-and- effect marketing and sales profession, has a vested interest in denying its existence...
New age views of karma are similar. If you are bad, as somehow defined, you built up bad karma (New Age view), or else God later burns you with fire (fundamentalist Christian view). For good deeds, you get good karma or treasures in heaven. It's basically an accountant's view of the world. Someone's keeping a balance sheet of all your actions, and toting up debits or credits. Of course, some religions allow you to wipe the slate clean in one fell swoop, say by baptism, or an act of contrition, which is sort of like declaring bankruptcy and getting relief from all your creditors. But that's only allowed because there has already been a blood sacrifice in your place. Jesus or Mithra or one of the other Saviors has already paid the price. But even so, old Santa Claus is up there somewhere checking who's naughty or nice...
...One may, of course, choose to help the rest of the world to the extent that one is able, assuming one knows how. But it is a choice, not an obligation. Modern political correctness and prostituted religion have tried to turn all of what used to be considered virtues into social obligations. Not that anyone is expected to really practice what they preach; rather it is intended they feel guilty for not doing so, and once the guilt trip is underway, their behavior can be manipulated for political purposes."
People peddling these obligations might as well be saying, "Pack your bags you're goin' on a guilt trip, shithead." And so The Believers go, blithely, leaving the blind-folds placed there by their Glorious Leaders.
...shades of Christianity and the Cult of Original Sin...with a twist, huh?
I eagerly await the Age of Consciousness...
...and wait...
...and wait...
The entire article.
|
|
|
| |
| Entropy sucks. |
| 09.03.04 (7:06 am) [edit] |
"If the historians are correct in their assessments of the collapse of previous civilizations, the continued structuring and ossification of life for the purpose of preserving institutional interests may likewise seal the fate of the American civilization.
Perhaps before our civilization completes its entropic fall, the information revolution may awaken our neighbors to the destructive consequences of allowing their lives to be structured for the benefit of institutions that have shown, by their lack of resiliency, to be no longer capable of producing the values upon which society depends. Even the most credulous among us may discover how they have allowed their lives – and the lives of their children – to be exploited and consumed on behalf of purposes that nowise comport with their own."
Do you know what the "values upon which society depends" are?
Can you name just a few fundamental ones?
Do you care? All.
|
|
|
| |
| Another cover-up thwarted |
| 09.02.04 (1:19 pm) [edit] |
The thieves were in their cat box covering their shit when they were found out... ________________________
"On 22 July 2004, the Justice Dept—via the Government Printing Office—told libraries to destroy five documents on asset forfeiture, a highly controversial practice in which the authorities take people's property. (Sometimes the people have been convicted of crimes; other times they haven't even been charged with a crime.) [Learnmore] The order said:
Please withdraw these materials immediately and destroy them by any means to prevent disclosure of their contents. The Department of Justice has determined that these materials are for internal use only.
The Memory Hole has obtained the sensitive documents that the Justice Dept wanted to destroy. They've been scanned and posted above."
See the story and see what they wanted to hide.
|
|
|
| |
| At the beginning again... |
| 09.02.04 (1:05 pm) [edit] |
"It makes me so happy. To be at the beginning again, knowing almost nothing. People were talking about the end of physics. Relativity and quantum mechanics looked as if they were going to clean out the whole problem between them. A theory of everything. But they only explained the very big and the very small. The universe, the elementary particles. The ordinary-sized stuff which is our lives, the things people write poetry about - clouds - daffodils -waterfalls - ... these things are full of mystery, as mysterious to us as the heavens were to the Greeks. Because the problem turns out to be different. We can't even predict the next drop from a dripping tap when it gets irregular. Each drip sets up the conditions for the next, the smallest variation blows prediction apart, and the weather in unpredictable the same way, will always be unpredictable. When you push the numbers through the computer you can see it on the screen. The future is disorder. A door like this has cracked open five or six times since we got up on our hind legs. It's the best possible time to be alive, when almost everything you thought you knew is wrong.........." Arcadia, by Tom Stoppard. _________________________ ________
So...if we don't even understand the "ordinary- sized stuff", what are we doing mucking about elsewhere?
Isn't that like running before you can walk?
And watch closely the professional pontificators, the politicians and other True Believers who "have all the answers".
Instead of being "discovered", they now all stand an excellent chance of being "found out".
|
|
|
| |
| Straw Men & Ham Sandwiches |
| 09.02.04 (9:33 am) [edit] |
A little surgery here on what most people treat with a hammer and anvil... _________________________ __
"The political means to wealth involves the organized use or threat of violence, whether it's an overt military action, or the complex network of intimidation behind taxation, regulation, licensing laws, and other interventions against voluntary exchange. By political means, wealth is never created – only redistributed. It is, at best, a zero-sum game: for some to win, others must lose.
The economic means to wealth involves convincing people to voluntarily part with what you want more by offering them what they want more. This is the basis of laissez-faire capitalism: the peaceful creation of wealth through exchange. (Most anti-capitalists have probably never confronted even the possibility of creating great wealth peacefully.)
The economic capitalist competes with other economic capitalists to satisfy the wants and needs of consumers, who are free to take their business elsewhere.
In contrast, a political capitalist appeals to the State to privilege his position above his competition. The victim of political wealth is both the would-be competition and the consumers themselves.
This capitalism, political capitalism(which we pro-capitalists sometimes call mercantilism, corporatism, state capitalism, crony capitalism, or even fascism), is something we and the anti- capitalists can agree on: it is the exploitation of the productive class by a parasitic class. We might even surprise them with our sample list of parasites: defense contractors, the banking cartel, the steel industry, big agribusiness, Halliburton ... But our agreement requires common recognition of the distinction between political and economic means."
The whole article.
|
|
|
| |
| Beware of the Pontificators |
| 09.01.04 (6:01 pm) [edit] |
"The wise man doesn't give the right answers, he poses the right questions." -- Claude Levi-Strauss
How many of these have you seen or talked to lately?
|
|
|
| |
| Cold Fusion Back From the Dead |
| 09.01.04 (1:28 pm) [edit] |
U.S. Energy Department gives true believers a new hearing
The call of the wild...free money!
"Other researchers are finally beginning to explain why the Pons-Fleischmann effect has been difficult to reproduce. Mike McKubre from SRI International, in Menlo Park, Calif., a respected researcher who is influential among those pursuing cold fusion, says that the effect can be reliably seen only once the palladium electrodes are packed with deuterium at ratios of 100 percent—one deuterium atom for every palladium atom. His work shows that if the ratio drops by as little as 10 points, to 90 percent, only 2 experimental runs in 12 produce excess heat, while all runs at a ratio of 100 percent produce excess heat.
And scientists are beginning to get a better handle on exactly how the effect occurs. Stanislaw Szpak and colleagues from the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command have taken infrared video images of palladium electrodes as they produce excess energy. It turns out that the heat is not produced continuously over the entire electrode but only in hot spots that erupt and then die on the electrode surface. This team also has evidence of curious mini-explosions on the surface."
Whole article.
|
|
|
| |
| President Flip Flop and Senator Grand Plan. |
| 09.01.04 (10:18 am) [edit] |
"Kerry's campaign accused Bush of 'flip-flops' on fighting terror. 'This president has gone from mission accomplished to mission miscalculated to mission impossible on the war on terror,' Kerry spokesman Phil Singer said in a statement. 'We need a leader who knows we can win the war on terror and has a plan to do it.'"
Ok, Senator, going for the top spot. Let's hear it.
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
|
|