 Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
Powerful links
The Great "I"
Advanced Thinking
Promethea
The Third Age of the World.
Just do it.
More consistently solid thinking.
Theory
and application.
"Rights", The Bad Con
Sign...or not.
Just say "no".
Declaration of Individual Independence
The
Voluntaryist
Lysander Spooner
Bugging out.
Examining chaos.
"Anybody wanting a
piece of me without
my consent can come
back tomorrow and
go to the end of
the line. I gladly
accept your
requirement to be
treated likewise."
--jomama
Blog Search Engine
You are here: http://jomama.tblog.com
More ornery blogs
John Lopez
Billy Beck
Loose Cannon
Gabriel Mihalache
Drizzten
Fred rants
Bill St. Clair
Other fine sites
Nexialist News
Simmering frogs.
Classic essays etc.
Who owns you?
Reasoning for Rational Anarchism
The Granfalloon
Part of a short work of fiction. (See Chaps. 7-12)
I won't.
Hit counter
November 19, 2004
17085
add this to your site

Where are visitors to this page?
|
| Tight oil. |
| 07.31.04 (12:36 pm) [edit] |
Looks like the boys from Yukos had a lotta clout. What do you think? (Look at the news about this posted here earlier.) _________________________ _
"The erratic behaviour of the Russian prosecutors, and the amazing, though plausible, idea that they might close down Yukos’s production, served to illustrate just how important Russian oil has become. Yukos alone produces 2% of the world’s output, and more than all the wells in Libya. A couple of years ago OPEC, the cartel of oil-exporting countries, was annoyed with Russia, which is not a member, for increasing production while the cartel tried to support the price through production quotas. But with demand booming and supply constrained, the world, and even OPEC, is now grateful for Russian production—it has become the second-biggest exporting nation, after Saudi Arabia. As output from oilfields in places like North America and the North Sea has declined, production from Russia and other former Soviet countries has shot up, by 2.5 billion bpd since 2001. This has helped to meet new demand from oil-thirsty China and other countries."
The story of tight oil.
|
|
|
| |
| Kerry is a mass-murderer. Bush is psycho. |
| 07.31.04 (4:50 am) [edit] |
"The more I think about it, the more I´m convinced that we´re reliving the last days of the Roman Empire.
If power tends to not only corrupt, but also drives even the best of us a little nuts, then what must it do to a fifth-rate intelligence like George W. Bush, the Boy Emperor of the West? The presidential depression also comes as no surprise: after all, wouldn´t you be a little bit down if you had just committed the worst foreign policy mistake in American history?...
From what we know about his activities as a star performer in the naval component of Operation Phoenix, which engaged in wholesale atrocities in Vietnam, it was something other than patriotism that motivated Kerry to cut a murderous swathe through 'enemy' villages, mowing down innocents without showing the least sign of remorse, not even years later. As Cockburn and St. Clair relate:
'Day after day, night after night, the Swift boats plied the waters, harassing and often killing villagers, fishermen and farmers. In this program, aimed at intimidating the peasants into submission, Kerry was notoriously zealous. One of his fellow lieutenants, James R. Wasser, described him admiringly in these words: "Kerry was an extremely aggressive officer and so was I. I liked that he took the fight to the enemy, that he was tough and gutsy – not afraid to spill blood for his country."'
Cockburn and St. Clair cite former assistant secretary of defense W. Scott Thompson´s recollection of a conversation with the late Admiral Elmo R. Zumwalt, Jr.:
'[T]he fabled and distinguished chief of naval operations, Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, told me – 30 years ago when he was still CNO [chief naval officer in Vietnam] – that during his own command of U.S. naval forces in Vietnam, just prior to his anointment as CNO, young Kerry had created great problems for him and the other top brass, by killing so many non-combatant civilians and going after other non-military targets. "We had virtually to straitjacket him to keep him under control," the admiral said. 'Bud Zumwalt got it right when he assessed Kerry as having large ambitions – but promised that his career in Vietnam would haunt him if he were ever on the national stage.'"
The author of the article then goes on to list the other candidates available for your vote. He too, doesn't know how to play the game without a ball, getting buried in power's detailed distractions, thinking a savior is just around the corner.
But why not read it all?
|
|
|
| |
| You or them? |
| 07.30.04 (3:42 pm) [edit] |
"It is unfortunately none too well understood that, just as the State has no money of its own, so it has no power of its own. All the power it has is what society gives it, plus what it confiscates from time to time on one pretext or another; there is no other source from which State power can be drawn. Therefore every assumption of State power, whether by gift or seizure, leaves society with so much less power; there is never, nor can there be, any strengthening of State power without a corresponding and roughly equivalent depletion of social power." --Albert Jay Nock
What it "confiscates" is also done when the state prints more money. The "confiscation" takes place thru inflation where the same amount of money buys less simply because there's more of it in circulation. Those holding debt of this example country, are screwed with "cheaper" currency. (Remember, it buys less.)
The current governments know inflation doesn't work. Currency markets will clobber their currency when a country's central bank gets out of line, but the central banks have no control and must print more currency as taxpayers flee even tho the Feds know that the currency markets will tell them they're wrong in doing so by selling that currency. These central banks think they're caught between a rock and a hard place, with no other option that they would consider satisfactory.
Others know better.
It won't matter.
At some point everyone dumps the currency, even tho it's currently believed to be the worlds reserve currency. (The USD holds that position now...barely.)
Then the euro or some other trash paper takes center stage...for a while.
The state is on the way out...or not.
Depends on how you look at it, right?
Will a new state takes its place?
By what means?
But I may just be blowing smoke up your ass or I may be wrong.
If you're interested, why not do your own research and thinking about it?
I recommend you start here.
|
|
|
| |
| Where did it go? |
| 07.30.04 (11:26 am) [edit] |
"Reading, and rigorous discussion of that reading in a way that obliges you to formulate a position and support it against objections, is an operational definition of education in its most fundamental civilized sense. No one can do this very well without learning ways of paying attention: from a knowledge of diction and syntax, figures of speech, etymology, and so on, to a sharp ability to separate the primary from the subordinate, understand allusion, master a range of modes of presentation, test truth, and penetrate beyond the obvious to the profound messages of text. Reading, analysis, and discussion are the way we develop reliable judgment, the principal way we come to penetrate covert movements behind the facade of public appearances. Without the ability to read and argue we’re just geese to be plucked...
Once you trust yourself to go mind-to-mind with great intellects, artists, scientists, warriors, and philosophers, you are finally free.
But now...don't we just suck it up like a sponge, uncritically? What does the boob tube teach about how to become a sponge?
In America, before we had forced schooling, an astonishing range of unlikely people knew reading was like Samson’s locks—something that could help make them formidable, that could teach them their rights and how to defend those rights, could lead them toward self-determination, free from intimidation by experts. These same unlikely people knew that the power bestowed through reading could give them insight into the ways of the human heart, so they would not be cheated or fooled so easily, and that it could provide an inexhaustible store of useful knowledge—advice on how to do just about anything."
Once upon a time.
|
|
|
| |
| The Coming Revolution |
| 07.29.04 (3:11 pm) [edit] |
Googling "Fuck the IRS", I was pleasantly surprised when I looked at the results:
"Results 1 - 10 of about 926 for 'fuck the irs'" showed at the top of the page.
926 pages! Impressive. There's hope after all.
Now I'm going to add to the list.
Fuck the IRS
Why not join the only revolution that makes any sense and add to the list? Any other will be nothing but trouble and a lot of spilt blood for nothing more than an attempt at polishing a turd.
Etienne de la Boetie 1553 France
"There are [four] kinds of tyrants: some receive their proud position through elections by the people, others by force of arms, others by inheritance, [others by 'divine right']. Although the means of coming into power differ, still the method of ruling is practically the same. The tyrant has nothing more than the power you confer upon him to destroy you. How does he have any power over you except through you? Tyrants need only be deprived of the public's continuing supply of funds and resources. Resolve to serve no more! and you are at once free. [My emphasis] I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer. Then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces."
But hardly anyone knows that the tyrant is the system itself.
Some strong evidence of this resolve below...
These stats below were taken from IRS records... _________________________ ______
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - "Americans' overall income shrank for two consecutive years after stocks plunged in 2000, the first time that has effectively happened since the current tax system was put in place during World War II, according to a published report Thursday...
The drop in income has hit government tax collections -- the paper said individual income taxes declined 18.8 percent between 2000 and 2002. Part of that was due to tax cuts passed in 2001.
Don't you think much of this shortfall came from folks joining the Underground Economy and avoiding the Political Economy?
The report said the sharpest drops were in both the number and the earnings of people with the highest incomes. Those with incomes of $10 million or more saw average income fall 22 percent, while the number of returns reporting incomes at that level fell 53 percent during the two year period."
I'm suddenly convinced that taxes on the rich should double so they all take their money and leave. And if you don't know how that's done, you should find out. It's exceeding simple. If the rich are heavily taxed the Fall of Empire will be over in a flash as that giant sucking sound of money leaving high tax countries is heard.
And I have small pity for the silly sombitches that will put up with the 80% tax rates coming as a result, no matter what the political economy does to try to collect it.
When tax revenues fall, what will the US Fed do to the money supply?
Inflate.
The last report I read estimated the entire US debt to be at $11 trillion including the off-budget proportion, but it's obvious nobody really knows how big it is.
Do you think there's any way to pay that off?
Sell US debt at 10 to 25 cents on the dollar?
Do the math.
But I've taken some things out of context from the article.
You should read the whole, short thing.
|
|
|
| |
| The Protest Pit |
| 07.29.04 (1:07 pm) [edit] |
First there were smoking zones, then smoking was outlawed in many places, soon to come in all places. Now there are free speech zones...
Draw your own conclusions.
I know.
You're not a smoker. _________________________ _
"With the exception of a handful of permitted marches and rallies, people who want to demonstrate their views during the DNC have been told they are free to do so, but only from the discomfort of a so-called free speech zone. Protest organizers refer to it as an internment camp or a detention center. The area the authorities have designated as the official protest area is enclosed by a maze of overhead netting, razor wire and chain link fence. The FleetCenter, where the convention is taking place, is barely visible through the abandoned elevated rail lines and green girders overhead. At this weekend's Boston Social Forum, there was quite a bit of discussion about the protest pit."
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| Watching the snoring. |
| 07.29.04 (11:18 am) [edit] |
I posted this before...quite a while ago.
As far as I'm concerned, this kind of thinking needs repeating...often.
But I can't help it. Watching people snore bores the shit outta me, so I gotta do something, even if it's wrong.
And don't we all think it's The Other Guy that's doing all the snoring? _________________________ ____________
"I can only suggest that he who would combat false consciousness and awaken people to their true interests has much to do, because the sleep is very deep. And I do not intend here to provide a lullaby but merely to sneak in and watch the way people snore." -- Frame Analysis, Erving Goffman
|
|
|
| |
| Ooops, here comes another fucking. |
| 07.28.04 (5:52 pm) [edit] |
"Crude oil futures rose to a record after OAO Yukos Oil Co., Russia's biggest oil exporter, said the government ordered a halt to production from its main Siberian unit.
So what's new? Every time government lifts a finger, someone takes it up the ass and we all suffer...decreasing production of one kind or another...and so moves the political means. Are you ready for higher gas prices?
The order forbids units from selling property, in effect banning oil sales and forcing a stop in output, Yukos lawyer Dmitry Gololobov said in a letter to chief bailiff Arkady Melnikov. Russia is seeking to recover $3.4 billion in back taxes and fines. Russia has attracted investment from BP Plc, Exxon Mobil Corp. and other companies searching for reserves.
'This is detrimental to the long-term supply outlook,' said Kyle Cooper, an analyst with Citigroup Inc. in Houston. 'It will become much harder to attract foreign investment in the Russian oil industry. Any investor in the future will demand much higher returns to make such a risky venture.'
Now, before you flys of the political means go spreading your droppings here, I have a secret to tell you.
An acquaintance, a gasoline tanker truck driver, told me recently that the oil companies make $.10 a gallon on the gas they sell. The reason they're well off is because they sell millions of gallons. Millions...my, that's a lotta votes, ain't it.
Bwahahahaha.
And if you want to bitch about the cost of gas, take a look at the visible taxes on each gallon and check this out, a fine example of the political means that most of you love so much. Now go check how much the Europeans love the political means attached to their gas prices. But I expect virtually no one to see the unintended consequences of this.
Unfucking believable, isn't it.
Now I expect to hear rants about the corporation, another granfalloon and child of your favorite granfalloon, the State.
And I won't be surprised when so many of you wonder what happened when the lights go out.
Will you?
The whole thing.
|
|
|
| |
| Have you seen the Big Puzzle yet? |
| 07.28.04 (3:25 pm) [edit] |
Stay tuned here for the continuing saga of yet another in a long string of articles on The Fall of Empire.
Here's another small piece of the Big Puzzle... _________________________ ___________
"WASHINGTON Maureen Dowd Maybe it's because I've been instructed to pack a respirator escape hood along with party dresses for the Boston convention. Maybe it's because our newspaper has assigned a terrorism reporter to cover a political convention. Maybe it's because George W. Bush is relaxing at his ranch down there (again) while Osama is planning a big attack up here (again). Maybe it's because there are just as many American soldiers dying in Iraq post- transfer, more Muslims more mad at Americans over fake weapons of mass destruction intelligence and depravity at Abu Ghraib, and more terrorists in more diffuse networks hating Americans more.
Maybe it's because the FBI is still learning how to Google and the CIA has an acting head who spends most of his time acting defensive over his agency's failure to get anything right. Maybe it's because so many of those federal twits who missed the 10 chances to stop the 9/11 hijackers, who blew off the Paul Reveres - Richard Clarke, Coleen Rowley and the Phoenix memo author - still run things. Call me crazy, Mr. President, but I don't feel any safer."
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| The essence of progress. |
| 07.28.04 (1:51 pm) [edit] |
If you want progress, shouldn't you avoid the conventional and predictable?
Scary, ain't it. ____________________
"Progress comes from people who think against the grain. Without nonconformists, you don't advance." -- Saw Ken Wye
|
|
|
| |
| Our Enemy, the State |
| 07.27.04 (6:25 pm) [edit] |
A short look at where all power ends...
Excerpted from Our Enemy, the State, by Albert Jay Nock: _________________________ ___
"'Such,' says Professor Ortega y Gasset, 'was the lamentable fate of ancient civilization.' A dozen empires have already finished the course that ours began three centuries ago. The lion and the lizard keep the vestiges that attest their passage upon earth, vestiges of cities which in their day were as proud and powerful as ours – Tadmor, Persepolis, Luxor, Baalbek – some of them indeed forgotten for thousands of years and brought to memory again only by the excavator, like those of the Mayas, and those buried in the sands of the Gobi. The sites which now bear Narbonne and Marseilles have borne the habitat of four successive civilizations, each of them, as St. James says, even as a vapour which appeareth for a little time and then vanisheth away. The course of all these civilizations was the same. Conquest, confiscation, the erection of the State; then the sequences which we have traced in the course of our own civilization; then the shock of some irruption which the social structure was too far weakened to resist, and from which it was left too disorganized to recover; and then the end."
The book.
|
|
|
| |
| Vibrant-verde-pistachio alert announced. |
| 07.27.04 (1:55 pm) [edit] |
Cryin' laughin', I am, at this... _________________________ ___
"September 23, 2003: The nation was placed on vibrant-verde-pistachio alert after reports that a substance found atop tacos in Phoenix may have been a chemical agent spread by terrorists seeking to weaken the nation's resolve. Conflicting reports have emerged. Citing unidentified sources, reporter Cokie Roberts said that the substance may instead have been disguised as pistachio ice cream atop handmade waffle cones. Security has been tightened around hospitals and taquerias in the area, and the governor has called out the National Guard to supervise Arizonan snack-and-dessert decisions. Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, an expert since the crisis posed to his administration by a suspect blob of guacamole on a Chicago sidewalk in the months after 9/11, has been called in as a consultant.
In a separate matter, 7,452 Indian and Icelandic nationals, Iranians, Turks, Ibos and Inuit indigenous tribespeople were released from custody under a special bill passed by Congress this week, the 'Au Pair Provision Act of 2004,' which seeks to remedy the nation's childcare crisis with in-home care for those who can afford it. The immigrants had been incarcerated during the Christmas season's crimson crisis, which focused on people from countries that either bordered Iraq or began with the letter 'I.' Saudi citizens in the US had been exempted under the Very Special Relationship, Emulsifiers and Emolients Act."
The whole hilarious thing.
|
|
|
| |
| Getting it half right. |
| 07.26.04 (5:02 pm) [edit] |
" 'Right now we've been spending a lot of energy in the government to dry up sources of funding,' ...
And what might be the unintended consequences of the above attempt? What happens when money doesn't move like it used to, due to the new Money Laundering Laws? What happens when it becomes more difficult to move money legitimately? What happens when fear pervades the legitimate movement of the worthless paper peddled by all nations as having 'value'?
Do your own research if any of this interests you. The topic gives me gas.
...Kean, a Republican, said on NBC's Meet the Press program. 'It might be more productive to spend more time following the money because you can disrupt plots, you can find out what's going on, if you can follow these money trails.'
The commission's report, released on Thursday, found it cost the al-Qaeda terror network between $400,000 and $500,000 to kill nearly 3,000 people in 2001, and the U.S. remains unable to determine the origin of those funds, Kean said. 'We'll never dry up all the money,' he said."
And so the Amurikan government runs off to frag folks into accepting "democracy", an abstraction and lie the victims never gave a shit about anyway and will continue to do so. Do you suppose these victims can see thru the Amurikan dream/scam? And all because the Amurikans can't 'dry up all the money'?
"We're just here to saddamize your chil'ren."
And I suspect 99% of the world doesn't understand how Amurika got so very ugly.
Could it have been Amurikan power exposed for what it is? Has this power been hidden from view until now?
And if you think that's only an Amurikan disease, you're fucked. It has permeated the planet since the day God was born, and this disease wasn't even his fault. By the way, I'm not even A Believer.
Stay tuned. Maybe enough of you can figure where shit started to go wrong, but I'm betting the odds are slim and none based on some of the comments I've seen to my posts. But most git it half right, flopping around on one wing, so maybe there's hope. Will half right git it?
On the other hand, hope in one hand and shit in the other to see which one fills up first.
Damn near nobody understands the difference between the political means and the economic means so I expect most to be lead into a complete Dark Age rather than just the Intellectual Dark Age Amurika has lived in since 1913.
Bwahahahahaha.
It's really sad but I gotta laugh otherwise I think I'd go insane.
Howbouchu?
Solutions, alternatives?
When ya got cancer, what do you replace it with?
But be very careful. The operation is very delicate and requires much more thought than you think. Physically fighting power is not the answer. A wise, long dead Chinaman named Lao Tse knew better.
Just keep talking.
Am I right?
How the hell would I know. You got a brain. Why not use it?
[/rant]
The rest of the article.
|
|
|
| |
| Chicken Hawk groupthink? |
| 07.26.04 (3:01 pm) [edit] |
"In a 1972 book, Victims of Groupthink: A Psychology Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, Irving Janis identified the Vietnam War and the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba as particularly compelling examples of how very smart people can collectively make very stupid decisions.
If you've been following the posts here, you might know that groups/institutions don't think but instead engage the members in mutual ass-kissing and looking for an enemy to bash over the head. The followers just nod their heads like plastic dogs one sees hanging by a thread in the back windows of some cars.
Have you ever watched a mob in action?
Have you ever seen a mob think?
Doesn't a mob have a personality different from the individuals in it? Isn't it enraged at its enemy and so, unthinking?
Doesn't a member of a mob do things he would never dream of doing on his own?
Do you ever engage in mob-think?
Would you know it if you did?
A great deal more is known about group dynamics within the Bush administration foreign-policy apparatus today - as a result of leaks, memoirs and books, such as Bob Woodward's Plan of Attack and Jim Mann's Rise of the Vulcans - than was known at the time about the Kennedy administration."
I think this is the key. The press has competition now from people doing the necessary homework and publishing their blogs, web pages and alternate media.
Given that, do you think the press has ever been anything more than a mouthpiece for power?
And how much do you need to know about this abstraction called 'group dynamics'? Sounds like a bullshit term to me. A group looks like a worm without a head to me. For the most part, a very vicious worm but essentially out of control...of anyone.
Full article.
|
|
|
| |
| The Two Choices you have. |
| 07.25.04 (6:09 pm) [edit] |
What are the two choices?
The political or the economic means.
I've posted material from another site on this before. It bears repeating.
Until most people understand this simple thing, it'll be same ol' shit, different day.
Isn't it up to you, and you alone?
Read carefully and think about it. _________________________ __
"There are two methods, or means, and only two, whereby man's needs and desires can be satisfied. One is the production and exchange of wealth; this is the economic means. The other is the uncompensated appropriation of wealth produced by others; this is the political means." -- Albert Jay Nock
|
|
|
| |
| The world's newest Banana Republic |
| 07.24.04 (7:22 pm) [edit] |
"But Homeland Security has revived a long disused relic of the McCarthy era, a special I-visa for journalists that entails, upon application overseas, being grilled by U.S. consular officials about whom the journalist plans to talk to and what he plans to write. Few other countries require those visas, and those that do tend to be unsavory Third World dictatorships."
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/articl e_4862.shtml" title="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/articl e_4862.shtml" target="_blank"http://www.capitolhillblue.co...
|
|
|
| |
| The ever present and failing institution |
| 07.24.04 (1:02 pm) [edit] |
(Washington, DC-AP, July 22, 2004, 7:20 a.m.) "The 9-11 panel is releasing its findings today with calls for an intelligence overhaul. The commission has concluded that governmental neglect did not cause the 2001 attacks. It says an underlying cause was a 'failure of imagination.'
Administration officials who are familiar with the report say it concludes the hijackers exploited 'deep institutional failings' within the government. The report also lists numerous missed opportunities to stop the hijackers. But it doesn't blame President Bush or former President Clinton for the mistakes.
So...can't we say they're not in charge? What purpose did they serve? To stand and babble? What? Just what are they in charge of? Are "things" out of control?
As expected, the report will call for creating a Cabinet-level national director of intelligence with authority over the entire intelligence community, including the CIA and the FBI."
Fine solution. [/sarcasm] When one or more institutions fail, create a bigger one to oversea the failures leaving the failures in place.
Does that make sense to you?
http://www.woodtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=2073676&nav=0RceP3m Z" title="http://www.woodtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=2073676&nav=0RceP3m Z" target="_blank"http://www.woodtv.com/Global/...
|
|
|
| |
| Why the Press Failed |
| 07.23.04 (4:05 pm) [edit] |
A better title for this article would be, Why the Press is Now Irrelevant. Who was The Press for The Church in its days of power? Wasn't it its very own scribes? _________________________ _________
"As reporting on the lead-up to war, the war itself, and its aftermath vividly demonstrated, our country is now divided into a two-tiered media structure. The lower-tier -- niche publications, alternative media outlets, and Internet sites -- hosts the broadest spectrum of viewpoints. Until the war effort began to unravel in spring 2004, the upper-tier -- a relatively small number of major broadcast outlets, newspapers, and magazines -- had a far more limited bandwidth of critical views, regularly deferring to the Bush Administration's vision of the world. Contrarian views below rarely bled upwards.'
Do you see how big changes are coming here? What happened to The Church after the invention of the printing press? What will happen to government because of the net?
Few in our media, it seemed, remembered I. F. Stone's hortatory admonition, 'If you want to know about governments, all you have to know is two words: Governments lie.' Dissenting voices in the mainstream were largely buried on back pages, ignored on op-ed pages, or confined to the margins of the media, and so denied the kinds of 'respectability' that a major media outlet can confer."
The whole story.
|
|
|
| |
| Lockdown in The Big Apple |
| 07.23.04 (5:23 am) [edit] |
"Madison Square Garden will be walled in by a fence or 'other physical barrier' with additional 'movable barricades', complete with checkpoints reinforced with heavy weapons. A new 'closed- circuit surveillance video system' will be introduced; armed federal agents and police officers will be keeping watch; and plenty of helicopters will be circling overhead. In Carpenter's future, however, the government was in control and New Yorkers were locked down. In our present, the administration of President George W Bush and the Republican Party are the ones retreating into a fortified bunker...
Wouldn't it be funny if no one showed up?
Who, in their right mind, would...for a whole host of reasons? Won't that tell you a hell of a lot about the ones that do?
Once upon a time in a past not so long ago, New York City was viewed by many in the Republican Party as an enemy outpost in an alien land. Then came the attacks of September 11, 2001, and Manhattan became the Bush administration's Ground Zero in its 'war against terrorism'. On January 31, 2003, with a supposed easy victory in the upcoming war with Iraq looming, it seemed the perfect place for the president to begin an inevitable march to a second term. But like the president's flight in Escape from New York, things have gone awry. New York once again looks like a threatening, alien land and the party of the president, whose greatest claim to fame is that he's made Americans 'safer', is about to treat the city as if it were Baghdad...
To sum up the 'security' scene: Choppers hovering above; military fighters streaking overhead; under foot, fumbling with cameras they never seem to know how to work, those famously easy-to-spot undercover cops clad in bulky sweatshirts (no matter the weather); federal suits listening to their earpieces; protective fences; 'frozen zones' (huge swaths of 'public' city streets to ordinary citizens); metal barriers; 'vehicle checkpoints around the perimeter of the Garden manned with heavy weapons, dogs and portable Delta barriers, which are enormous metal contraptions that lie almost flat in the road and can be raised very quickly with the flip of a switch'; mounted police; cops on bikes and scooters; NYPD K-9 (police dog) units; stormtrooper-esque 'Hercules' teams; conventional 'arrest teams'; cops boarding commuter trains and subway cars one stop before they reach Penn Station, the hub nearest the Garden; permit refusals; murmurs about the invocation of an 1845 law prohibiting mask- wearing under certain circumstances; and Kelly and Bloomberg periodically claiming to know protesters' plans or issuing wild claims about the supposed plans of violent anarchists, 'hardcore groups ... looking to take us on'; and various administration officials issuing vague but chilling warnings of possible terrorism to come...
President Bush, who continually tells us that our world is safer due to him, aims to arrive in an alien 'New York City' out of some lockdown sci- fi movie - a place specially prepared to make him the safest man on Earth. And yet New York isn't a stage set, and the best-laid plans of frightened and controlling officials do have a way of coming undone, just as they did last February in New York when, having been prohibited from marching, hundreds of thousands of protesters, directed toward police 'pens', snarled traffic and literally took over large portions of the city. Who knows in what strange ways life will burst into New York despite official efforts to empty the city and lock down Madison Square Garden?"
Indeed. Chaos is better organized. It's been around longer.
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| Expatriate Manifesto |
| 07.22.04 (1:33 pm) [edit] |
A description of why I left....
Excerpted from the link below:
"A spectre is haunting America—the hollow-eyed and moaning spectre of our nation's decline (2). It haunts the expanding waistlines of our increasingly obese citizenry (3). It lurks among the ineloquent yo's and ho's of our popular discourse, a diminished national conversation of ghetto kabuki, rhyming doggerel and white-boy ebonics. It peeps from the crusty, ragged piercing holes in the flesh of our self-mutilated youth. It rattles its chains at the hubris of our foreign policy and the imbecilic pap of our summer blockbusters. It stalks the parapets of our crumbling democracy, howling at our low voter turn-out and groaning at a republic of television- entranced morons with little knowledge of or interest in the world outside their cycles of compulsive consumption....
The defining aspect of expatriate life—the sensation, whether they know it or not, that all expatriates are seeking when they decide to depart Homeland—is anomy. Anomy is defined as a lack of familiar rules and values. The expatriate must learn the local language and customs. He must find shelter and sustenance with no network of family or friends to assist him. Anomy means the removal of context, both the strictures of prejudice and the false props of family reputation and class. The expatriate is a stranger whose actions are judged prima facie by the locals, qualified of course by common American stereotypes...
Anomy encourages independence, self-expression and the development of new ideas. It is no accident that the most innovative and enduring art of the last century was created by expatriates. Anomy requires self-reliance and initiative. Mental and physical vigor are rewarded by anomy; sloth and hebetude are punished. Anomy inspires humanistic sympathy for the previously strange and unfamiliar and favors the strong and imaginative and individualistic. Anomy is what made America great. A dearth of anomy and its salutary effect on the human organism is responsible for the spectre of our nation's decline...
All true patriots shiver in dread when confronted with this spectre that no jump in GDP, world-changing Silicon Valley tech innovation or smackdown of suicidal terrorists can dispel. Conservatives decry a decline in family values while Liberals, a decline in social justice. Many are the scapegoats incorrectly identified as responsible for the invocation of this spectre, and many are the forces that fruitlessly attempt to exorcize it. But it endures and grows in strength of presence—a recurring visitation, an adumbration, the ghost of America's future. It endures and grows because this malaise has yet to be correctly diagnosed, nor has a workable remedy been proffered.
Until now."
All of it.
|
|
|
| |
| The Gospel according to Dubya. |
| 07.22.04 (8:19 am) [edit] |
"The Bush Administration had little esteem for the watchdog role of the press, in part because its own quest for 'truth' has been based on something other than empiricism. In fact, it enthroned a new criterion for veracity, 'faith- based' truth, sometimes corroborated by 'faith - based' intelligence. For officials of this administration (and not just the religious ones either), truth seemed to descend from on high, a kind of divine revelation begging no further earthly scrutiny. For our President this was evidently literally the case. The Israeli paper Ha'aretz reported him saying to Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Prime Minister of the moment, 'God told me to strike Al Qaeda and I struck, and then he instructed me to strike Saddam, which I did.'
Just as the free exchange of information plays little role in the relationship between a fundamentalist believer and his or her God, so it has played a distinctly diminished role in our recent parallel world of divine political revelation. After all, if you already know the answer to a question, of what use is the media, except to broadcast that answer? The task at hand, then, is never to listen but to proselytize the political gospel among non-believers, thereby transforming a once interactive process between citizen and leader into evangelism."
Ahh, yes...the New Gospel of Divine Political Revelation. This competition must be an embarrassment to Christians and other True Believers of a different flavor.
More...
|
|
|
| |
| Another deviant look at things. |
| 07.22.04 (4:37 am) [edit] |
I ain't on this planet to please anyone, even if I could. I can't so I won't even try.
Why do I do this blog routine?
I dunno. Sometimes I think it's exercising 'tuff luv', other times I just wanna draw my lines, pissin' in my corners like a junkyard dog.
What I do know is that stasis is death.
Why not stir the pot?
Here's one such stirrer... _________________________ _
"Given an objective view of the human phenomenon at its origin, in relation to each person who started thinking about each concept, when would you have predicted that humans would discover that the earth was round, that the South Pole would be reached by humans, that humans would land on the moon, and return, that the human genome would be mapped, that humans live for 500 years, that war and bashing each other over the head become amusing relics of history, that frequent flier mileage is available on trips to other galaxies, with a double mileage bonus in the off-season?
How long do you want to wait for the manifestation of your desires? What incentive will you offer for the knowledge of how to produce them today?
Considering the number of things each person can pursue with his time, precisely who, under precisely what incentive, is pursuing the goals of your greatest desire? If you named persons in institutions purportedly pursuing those goals, you are as self-deluded as they. Many humans commit suicide, as is their choice, completely within the control of an individual mind. If an institution actually achieves its defined goal, it leaves itself without its excuse to exist, thus committing suicide. While that is a choice of individual minds, every institution will refuse to do because there are other people in the institution who crave the institutional leadership positions (power) more than the achievement of the espoused goal, by design of the concept of power in the human mind, despite their denials at reading these words. And those people are the ones doing the actual work to insure the referenced goals are never achieved. You do not command your own mind until you can answer every question any mind can devise, without creating a contradiction, encompassing each part of the human mind's puzzle. Until then you are subject to the mind's controlling concepts, such as the incentive of power over reason in a mind lacking the referenced knowledge."
Read it and weep with laughter.
|
|
|
| |
| Do you have a virus of the mind? |
| 07.21.04 (4:47 pm) [edit] |
Just a small sample.... _________________________ _
"A subset of memes: political memes or pemes. Pemes influence political behavior. If memes are the secret to understanding behavior, pemes are the secret to understanding political behavior.
The Peme Imperative
1. Peme survival and propagation shall be the ultimate imperative.
You mean like, "We gotta take back our country."?
2. Pemes shall infect, pervade, and absolutely rule all human brains.
Like the Borg? Holy shit, Batman!
3. Pemes shall speak through the mouths and write through the pens and keyboards of humans at every opportunity.
Yuk! Ugly, ain't it.
4. There shall be surface pemes, middle pemes, and deep pemes; pemes shall be positive, neutral, or negative.
Damn, they're everywhere.
5. Pemes shall divide humans into opposing and conflicting political and economic factions -- such as "conservative" / "liberal," "capitalist" / "socialist," and "statist" / "anarchist" -- who shall endlessly argue, fight, and even kill... all in the name of pemes.
Wow! Did a light just go on or was that a lightening strike?
6. All humans shall be subjected to "compulsory education" (a negative surface peme) to ensure that their brains are thoroughly implanted with surface, middle, and deep pemes -- positive, neutral, or negative.
Ooooh. Feels sooooo good to let someone else think for me. I'll gofurit.
7. Negative surface pemes shall induce mild soporific, stupefying, and debilitating effects in human brains...."
Ooooouuuummmm.
[/sarcasm]
There are a lot more at the link below. Have you installed your virus software...in your head? Did you think that stuff was just for your computer?
Bwaahahahaha!
Wanna check it out?
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| Doesn't look good, does it. |
| 07.21.04 (2:54 pm) [edit] |
You got any ideas...real solid ideas and not the standard pap...about what to do about it? _________________________ ___________
"The violent strategies chosen by our government, not properly questioned by a compliant and uninformed mainstream, will blow back to haunt us, for in destroying human lives in other parts of the world, we destroy parts of ourselves; ultimately, we sow our own destruction."
Full essay.
|
|
|
| |
| Are you innocent any longer? |
| 07.21.04 (10:03 am) [edit] |
Does anyone even remember what an innocent man is? ________________________
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. When there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws." -- Ayn Rand
|
|
|
| |
| Who does this describe? |
| 07.20.04 (2:50 pm) [edit] |
I mean, who are 'the few fools'...? What group are they represented by? __________________
"Fortunately for themselves and for the world, nearly all men are cowards and dare not act on what they believe. Nearly all our disasters come of a few fools having the 'courage of their convictions.'" -- Coventry Patmor
|
|
|
| |
| The Chickenhawks |
| 07.20.04 (5:58 am) [edit] |
"The full story of the modern Chickenhawk is this: deluded, lying, blood-thirsty cowards, afflicted with hubris, who have a lust for political power and attention. They refuse to fight, but trick other[sic]into doing so, because of their mistaken belief in their intellectual and moral superiority. They think the belief in their superiority gives them the right to sacrifice huge numbers of people, who should do as they are ordered, without question, so the Chickenhawks can social-engineer the world through political violence, as the way the Borg Queen wanted to, when she said, 'Why do you oppose us? We only wish to improve the quality of your lives.'"
Of course. "We're just here to help." My, my. Such service!
Aren't you happy you're not getting all you're paying for?
http://www.strike-the-root.com/4/wallace/wallace18.html" title="http://www.strike-the-root.com/4/wallace/wallace18.html" target="_blank"http://www.strike-the-root.co...
|
|
|
| |
| What are the effects of the worship of power? |
| 07.19.04 (2:24 pm) [edit] |
Does anyone out there really understand this below...completely? Again, I doubt that one in one-thousand does. To you who do, it doesn't look good, does it? But you already know that and have taken steps to be as far away from the results as is possible. What a fucking show it'll be, eh?
Libertarians are only the most obvious suckers.
What of the rest of the worshippers of power over reason who will deny, deny, deny the very fact that they worshit it? [That wasn't a typo.]
Are you all wrapped in a power envelope inside a power envelope inside a power envelope?
Does anyone know how to reason anymore or is it all about power now?
Are there no salesmen out there selling ideas with incentives or just thugs with guns and billy clubs waving supoenas?
If it's all about power now, what does that tell you of the future, your future? Did you know that power and intelligence are mutually exclusive?
"'But what would you replace the state with?' The question reveals an inability to imagine human society without the state. Yet it would seem that an institution that can take 200,000,000 lives within a century hardly needs to be 'replaced.'"
I include the link directly above because it appears that few on tblog know how to read and/or reason through the simplest of puzzles. How do I know? It's obvious from some of the responses to the comments I make on some other blogs here but you outsiders to tblog wouldn't know that. That's the only reason I mention it. I posted the link above a couple of days ago and one Dull Spark called me a neo-con. He obviously didn't read or understand my posts here.
Bwahahahaha.
For those of you who don't know what a neo-con is, don't bother. They're just as Dull as the rest of 'em.
I could say wake the fuck up but what good would it do for all the Dull Sparks out there?
Doesn't anyone know how to play the game without a ball?
_________________________ __________________
"The Libertarian craving for the attention of news journalists who inherently cannot understand the Libertarian concept, verifiably so upon only a few questions, is only one of the amusing contradictions of Libertarians who espouse the process and results of reasoning, instead of force, by foolishly attempting to manifest it with a majority rule political party, which is an instrument of force, not reasoning, but attempting to force nobody, and therefore not attracting the news media attention that they crave to help build a force-based political party within a government-taught society that therefore learns to function on force rather than human reasoning. The power-damaged minds of the Libertarian Party leaders become angry and confused when they encounter words such as these, like all institutionally power-damaged minds, rather than become curious and ask questions to advance their knowledge, as all experience has shown, and as reasoning can explain. Some of that experience with Libertarian Party leaders has been most amusing.
If you are not laughing at the humans who create such labyrinths of contradictions from unresolved original contradictions they claim to be resolving with what are identifiably more contradictions, you are missing the only show humans know how to stage. If you are laughing, you are in a position to learn how to easily resolve the most complex contradictions humans can fabricate. The process is just knowledge. It is a multi-part puzzle.
The Libertarian Party leaders can read these plain English words, which carry their meanings, and their minds would only be confused and angered. Their power-damaged minds will die of old age, still clueless of what went wrong with their ludicrous illusion of gaining inherently corrupting power, to rid corruption from power, just as the Anarchist Party leaders cannot understand what when wrong at their convention, if you therefore enjoy the comedy. The LP sorts asked enough questions to understand enough of the puzzle to recognize why the other guy's power- based institutions are failing the process of reasoning, but did not ask the subsequent questions (reasoning process) to understand that the controlling contradiction was that of the institution, the creation of an instrument of power, a political party process, regardless of which persons were attached to the Parties of whatever names.
The other guy is not the problem. The institution is the problem, any institution, including and primarily one's own, such as the Libertarian Party. Institutionally created power alters the human mind's perceptions, to preclude learning the controlling contradictions. Once an institution or organization is created, and therefore creates the concept of institutional power, the institution must and shall be defended by its leaders and members, above all reasoning, or there is no reason for the institution to exist."
For those that know how to reason.
It's a waste of time for the rest of you.
|
|
|
| |
| More divine comedy with a different flavor. |
| 07.18.04 (5:38 pm) [edit] |
You'd hafta be an idiot's idiot to run for Prez. Hot damn! What am I saying? They are!
See what the folks from India are quoting American comedians saying about this particular crop of idiots: _________________________ ___________
"The American Presidential election is shaping up to be a contest between dumb and dull. While George Bush's lack of grey matter has been the butt of jokes for years, John Kerry has overnight acquired the reputation of being so dull and wooden that he is being called 'Al Gore without the flash and the sizzle.'
Even the staid Economist ribbed the Democratic candidate this week, saying he can 'put a hummingbird into a coma.'
From Jay Leno: 'John Kerry says that he wants to debate President Bush once a month until the election. This could be a risky move for Senator Kerry. If Bush doesn't show up for the debates, John Kerry may end up debating an empty chair. And that could be pretty much a toss up as to which one has the better personality.'
Even with Bush, Kerry and an empty chair, wouldn't the chair win?
'Kerry was here in Los Angeles. He was courting the Spanish vote by speaking Spanish. And he showed people he could be boring in two languages,'' taunted Leno.
The media is not even sparing Kerry lugubrious looks. The Economist said Kerry looks like a portrait of himself by Edvard Munch (a Norwegian expressionist painter known for his symbolic portrayal of misery and death)."
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/782517.cms" title="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/782517.cms" target="_blank"http://timesofindia.indiatime...
|
|
|
| |
| Message to the birds. |
| 07.18.04 (11:00 am) [edit] |
Wandering around tblog.com and elsewhere, I notice so many birds talking about the others' wings that I thought I'd start a new party, one without wings, unclassifiable... something to fuck with the heads of these winged creatures flopping around on just one wing.
My party is called The Radical Centrist Party and it has only one member: me. It has no wings and no room for new members. It doesn't fly, even in circles with one wing dragging the ground. It has both feet on the ground.
I am the Prez, Sect'y-Treasurer, Vice-Prez, Chairman of Vice and Foolishness, and only dues paying member. (When I fuck up, I pay the dues. Can ya dig it?)
The party platform is located, signed with my name, on the panel on the left side of this page.
I vote for everything and I always win by a landslide. I rule my party and I hardly ever miss my goals, unlike the single-winged fools, yearning for other like-winged fools to Make Their Life aw Better with even other's stolen money. (Odd, these single-winged hyumans.)
Membership to the Radical Centrist Party is closed and I put no party above me and never vote outside my party.
And membership will always be closed.
Why not start your own Radical Centrist Party?
|
|
|
| |
| What do you think? |
| 07.18.04 (10:08 am) [edit] |
|
"Language was invented to ask questions. Answers may be given by grunts and gestures, but questions must be spoken. Humanness came of age when man asked the first question. Social stagnation results not from a lack of answers but from the absence of the impulse to ask questions." -- Eric Hoffer
|
|
|
| |
| Another myth uncovered. |
| 07.18.04 (7:03 am) [edit] |
"The Sun´s radiance may well have an impact on climate change but it needs to be looked at in conjunction with other factors such as greenhouse gases, sulphate aerosols and volcano activity,' he said. The research adds weight to the views of David Bellamy, the conservationist. 'Global warming - at least the modern nightmare version - is a myth,' he said. 'I am sure of it and so are a growing number of scientists. But what is really worrying is that the world´s politicians and policy-makers are not.
'Instead, they have an unshakeable faith in what has, unfortunately, become one of the central credos of the environmental movement: humans burn fossil fuels, which release increased levels of carbon dioxide - the principal so-called greenhouse gas - into the atmosphere, causing the atmosphere to heat up. They say this is global warming: I say this is poppycock.'"
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| Some real whistleblowing. |
| 07.17.04 (4:03 pm) [edit] |
I doubt one in a hundred people would believe this.
But don't believe me. Look around. Why not do your own research? _________________________ _________
"The greatest tragedy in our culture is the widely accepted lie that the wars in U.S. history, since after the American Revolution, have been necessary, proper and even glorious. And this lie has been swallowed, parroted, and perpetuated by many of those who call themselves conservatives, liberals, progressives, socialists, constitutionalists, 'libertarians' and even 'anarchists' – all to the fatal detriment of American civilization and the lives of countless millions."
See the details.
|
|
|
| |
| "Shaddam" Hussein in the flesh and on camera. |
| 07.17.04 (4:50 am) [edit] |
Will the real Sadman please stand up?
Just another day of lies and cover-ups... _________________________ _________
"Clearly these accredited journalists from San Francisco and Sydney must have been hallucinating badly, or simply mistook a clean-shaven court janitor for the alleged President of Iraq, because less than two hours later they were swiftly cast aside in favor of the 'A' team from New York, headed by Mossad favorite Christiane Amanpour of CNN, a hard-nosed chief correspondent who never let truth get in her way during Gulf War One.
Christiane had photographs all right, in fact she had several hundred feet of edited video footage direct from the 'courtroom', though we have no proof of where the mock courtroom actually is, or where the video footage was shot. But as we will see quite clearly in a moment, Amanpour's damning footage actually proves that the prisoner cannot be President Saddam Hussein, leaving us with the problem of how to label the different players in this bizarre Orwellian tableaux. So let us shorten the name of the Mossad imposter from 'Sham Saddam' to simple 'Shaddam', and refer to the absent Saddam Hussein as 'President Hussein', which was and still is his correct title in international law."
Story and photo proof.
|
|
|
| |
| An illusion or an illusion of an illusion? |
| 07.16.04 (6:54 pm) [edit] |
Shespecies made the following comment on one of my posts here:
"The life we have here on this planet is merely an illusion..."
If it is an illusion, how would we know? Don't we have to know what's real to define an illusion?
Have you had some divine revelation about what reality looks like?
I don't doubt that many are living delusional lives, but to them how could it be obvious unless they knew what was real?
If someone can't resolve contradictions, let alone see them, wouldn't life appear as an illusion due to the lack of ability to think clearly?
From where I sit on my little chair buzzing around the net most folks sound confused, probably because they been covered with bullshit for so long, not carrying the proper repellent.
Of course, I, like all the other hyumans I know have a necessarily limited view of the world.
All I can do is make assumptions, just like everyone else.
It works for me.
Don't let anyone tell you different.
By the way, there are quite a few illusionists out there.
It might be a good idea to learn how to spot 'em.
Think about it.
|
|
|
| |
| More mental masturbation. |
| 07.16.04 (11:40 am) [edit] |
"The covert operations carried out by the CIA, both information collection and covert actions designed to influence the policies of other governments, actually are and have to be part of the U.S. policymaking and policy-implementing establishment. The intelligence analysis functions, on the other hand, should be separated to the maximum degree possible from policymaking and should never be distorted or falsified in order to support policies already desired by any administration."
Bwahahahahahah.
This hyuman doesn't get it either.
More shuffling of deck chairs won't change a thing.
If you've been doing your homework by reading some of the Advanced Thinking pieces I've posted here you already know that creating a New Mutual Ass-Kissing Institution is not an innovation. How is it possible to create a new and improved power-based institution?
If you're really interested in more mental masturbation...
|
|
|
| |
| The Political Animal House |
| 07.16.04 (5:37 am) [edit] |
Isn't it really all so simple?
After all the yammering, shuffling of deck chairs, naming names and all sorts of birds, it really just comes down to this... _________________________ ____________
"The names are not material. [My emphasis] The concepts are at play, and categorically controlling. Learn the concepts. You can apply any names of leaders, militaries, countries, gangs, political parties or any other institutions (two or more humans organized under a separate name) utilizing any form of force, including the force of majority rule votes for laws backed by armed police, throughout history, and verify every inherent result in the past, and itemize every result in the future, and laugh yourself to tears over the most brilliantly designed comedy known to humans, humans, while fools too lazy to ask a few more questions continue to wring their hands and anguish over the results, or run off to wars or ballot boxes to create those force-created contradictions."
Even the Libertarian Party isn't immune. See why...
|
|
|
| |
| More machinations of the Cult of Power. |
| 07.15.04 (12:16 pm) [edit] |
If you like to read about all the Left/Right wing machinations of power, go to the link below. Personally, it bores the shit outta me, but the conclusion in the paragraph below is apt.
I think wings are for the birds. _________________________ ________________
"The cult of Power, with its roots in the Left and its present hegemony over the Right, is the eternal enemy of peace and liberty. Like any cult, it has an exoteric philosophy, which is presented in reams of essays and proclamations extolling the virtues of 'democracy' – while its esoteric meaning is embodied in the photos of the Abu Ghraib house of horrors."
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=302 7" title="http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=302 7" target="_blank"http://www.antiwar.com/justin...
|
|
|
| |
| A rarity. |
| 07.14.04 (6:48 pm) [edit] |
Now here's a guy who probably figured out he pays a cost for being wrong.
Cheers, John. ____________________
"The Free Press corrects all errors of fact. If you know of an error, please call John X. Miller, public editor, at 313-222-2441 or 800-678-7771 anytime, write him at 600 W. Fort, Detroit 48226, or send e-mail to miller@freepress.com."
http://www.freep.com/news/metro/strait14_2 0040714.htm" title="http://www.freep.com/news/metro/strait14_2 0040714.htm" target="_blank"http://www.freep.com/news/met...
|
|
|
| |
| Accountability |
| 07.13.04 (6:22 pm) [edit] |
Do you know what group of people he's talking about? _________________________ _________
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong." -- Thomas Sowell
|
|
|
| |
| Fahrenhype 9/11 |
| 07.13.04 (2:37 pm) [edit] |
It's the power, folks, it's the power.
Shun it.
Keep looking at Big Picture until the last puzzle piece snaps into place. _________________________ ___
"I am delighted the movie is out there, disappointing as I found the depth of research, but the danger is that people will think they now know the information that has been kept from them and therefore fail to realise that Moore has about 2% of the real background to global events and control. Or that they will focus themselves on targeting and removing Bush when he is just a puppet and Kerry would be another."
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| A Reluctant Anarchist |
| 07.13.04 (12:45 pm) [edit] |
I'm not going to tell you who wrote this. His identity might color your thinking. Just read it for the ideas. Ideas are what count. Not personalities, doncha think? _________________________ _________
"As Hoppe argues, this is the flaw in thinking the state can be controlled by a constitution. Once granted, state power naturally becomes absolute. Obedience is a one-way street. Notionally, 'We the People' create a government and specify the powers it is allowed to exercise over us; our rulers swear before God that they will respect the limits we impose on them; but when they trample down those limits, our duty to obey them remains...
Other things have helped change my mind. R.J. Rummel of the University of Hawaii calculates that in the twentieth century alone, states murdered about 162,000,000 million of their own subjects. This figure doesn’t include the tens of millions of foreigners they killed in war. How, then, can we speak of states 'protecting' their people? No amount of private crime could have claimed such a toll. As for warfare, Paul Fussell’s book Wartime portrays battle with such horrifying vividness that, although this wasn’t its intention, I came to doubt whether any war could be justified...
If I said it once, I'm gonna say it a million times: Isn't it the fault of the followers and not the leaders?
The essence of the state is its legal monopoly of force. But force is subhuman; in words I quote incessantly, Simone Weil defined it as 'that which turns a person into a thing — either corpse or slave.' It may sometimes be a necessary evil, in self-defense or defense of the innocent, but nobody can have by right what the state claims: an exclusive privilege of using it...
'But what would you replace the state with?' The question reveals an inability to imagine human society without the state. Yet it would seem that an institution that can take 200,000,000 lives within a century hardly needs to be 'replaced.'"
Who'da thunk it?
The whole thing.
|
|
|
| |
| Do you think your leaders are demented...or do you even have one? |
| 07.12.04 (3:11 pm) [edit] |
Now here we have an explanation of something different...by a college of shrinks. Doesn't really blow my skirt up. How about yours?
As far as I'm concerned all leaders are demented.
Could it be that the Feel of Power is the cause... a virus invades the mind, destroying it? _________________________ ________
"Consultant psychiatrist Dr George El-Nimr said World War II might not have happened if past US president Woodrow Wilson had bowed down to his dementia.
Stalin and Franklin D Roosevelt most probably had dementia too, he said.
Dr El-Nimr and colleagues spoke at the Royal College of Psychiatrists' annual conference in Harrogate.
Dr El-Nimr, from Haywood Hospital in Stoke-on- Trent, and his colleagues Dr Baseem Habeeb, at Mersey NHS Trust, and Dr Emad Sulib, senior lecturer in psychiatry at Liverpool University, looked at the possible impact dementia may have had on seven world leaders.
Millions of Russians might have been saved from death if the dictator Stalin had seen a psychiatrist, they believe.
Not likely. What of the 20 or so million Ukranians that his followers killed, leaving them no shovels to bury their dead. Who were the demented there, Stalin or the followers of his orders?...or both?
You decide.
They told doctors attending the conference that Stalin's behaviour could easily be explained by dementia following a series of strokes.
Yea. You find out people are uncontrollable, you go into a rage, your blood pressure skyrockets giving you a stroke, then you kill 'em because you can't control 'em. Looks like a lot of nonsense to me. What do you think?
'This might be an explanation for the florid paranoia, dimming of superior intellect and the unleashing of his most sadistic personality traits,' said Dr El-Nimr."
"dimming of superior intellect"? Holy shit, Batman. Why would anyone with superior intellect want to exercise power? Power and intellect are opposites. Who needs power when they can use the mind to overcome all obstacles? Could it be just because they're in a fucking hurry to accomplish their goals because they know life is short?
When you get pissed off, do you think straight?
I don't.
So much for dementia and the army of shrinks.
Think about it.
Full article.
|
|
|
| |
| This just in... |
| 07.12.04 (9:34 am) [edit] |
A marine squad was marching north of Basra when they came upon an Iraqi soldier badly injured and unconscious.
Nearby, on the opposite side of the road, was an American Marine in a similar but less serious state The Marine was conscious and alert. As first aid was given to both men, the Marine was asked what had happened. The Marine reported, "I was heavily armed and moving north along the highway and coming south was a heavily armed Iraqi soldier. Seeing each other we both took cover."
"What happened then?" the corpsman asked.
"I yelled to him that Saddam Hussein was a miserable low life slug, and he yelled back: 'George Bush, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Bill and Hillary Clinton are miserable slime balls'. "
"We were standing there shaking hands when a truck hit us."
|
|
|
| |
| Why we're stuck in this rut. |
| 07.11.04 (12:58 pm) [edit] |
Life is too short for any sincere person to make any good difference today on any level that would count except maybe in the field of divine comedy.
|
|
|
| |
| A major slice of the Grand Illusion |
| 07.11.04 (4:14 am) [edit] |
And payment from you is even demanded for this.... ________________________
"The US President and all of his institutional advisors seek their consultants and advisors only from within their own institutional box, by definition of the institutional design. The situation is more amusing than you first recognize. To be selected as an advisor to the president or any high title of any institution, one must first be selected by a small or large legion of current advisors, each weeding out anyone who says anything that makes their mind uncomfortable, precisely the new knowledge for which a useful advisor would be selected. The results in sum are the most intellectually absent yes-men available in society, selected as so- called advisors, by design of that process. Any rhetorical denials, upon seeing these words of obvious truth, are only a fool's illusion first fooling the fool who would attempt to deny such obvious truth. And the original advisors directly selected by the president and such chaps, are inherently their friends, having become their friends because they routinely agreed with the chap they helped acquire the title. The only useful advice to the human mind is that which contradicts the mind's current conclusions, to thus create the questions to correct or verify the conclusions. There is no currently manifested process for an institutional leader to acquire useful advisors." [All italics here are my emphasis.]
Full essay.
|
|
|
| |
| Chaos is order or Who's in Charge, Part II |
| 07.10.04 (5:40 pm) [edit] |
The natural state of the planet is chaos because chaos is better organized.
Look around you for the proof. Endless wars for an elusive peace. Endless rules creating more disorder and more criminals daily.
And I ain't even scratched that proverbial surface.
Look for the paradox.
|
|
|
| |
| First Fuel Cell Cars Delivered to Customers in Berlin |
| 07.10.04 (10:31 am) [edit] |
I wonder what might beat the FCV to a large market share...a magnetic motor car? ______________________
* DaimlerChrysler hands over Mercedes-Benz A- Class "F-Cell" vehicles to Deutsche Telekom and BEWAG/Vattenfall Europe
* Europe's first service station for fuel cell cars opened for regular operation
* By the end of 2004, a total of 60 "F- Cells" will be in use by customers throughout the world
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| Power or wisdom. |
| 07.10.04 (5:43 am) [edit] |
Which do you choose, power or wisdom?
It's simple. Make your choice.
Big trouble in River City tho, as most can't rightly tell the difference, so I expect we'll muddle along unless some dickhead pushes the red button somewhere, following without question the orders of a Supreme Dickhead.
But even in the worst case, life will probably start all over, possibly in some other form.
But wouldn't that be a waste of time and energy? _________________________ _____
A very small piece from the link below:
"There is no social mechanism to place knowledgeable people in positions of social governance, regardless of their percentage in the population. In fact each existing mechanism creating social governance is counter productive to achieving knowledge, wisdom, intelligence or any such concept as a governing process.
All the existing mechanisms create power, the antithesis of logic, knowledge or wisdom."
http://www.think.ws/relatedconcepts-5.html" title="http://www.think.ws/relatedconcepts-5.html" target="_blank"http://www.think.ws/relatedco...
|
|
|
| |
| The contradictory, confusing hyuman animal. |
| 07.08.04 (7:38 pm) [edit] |
Odd, the hyuman animal.
A good portion of his existence is spent convincing others to buy a product or service from him to continue his survival.
On the other hand, a growing slice of the waking hours of many are spent convincing others of the necessity of electing someone they don't know, to give them orders and services they are told they can't refuse and, in addition, that they must pay for these things without question even when these orders and services may no longer be wanted by the person doing the paying.
And then the process begins again...for lack of the refund.
Why are these hyumans so confused?
|
|
|
| |
| Breaking news in the deadly soap opera. |
| 07.08.04 (9:53 am) [edit] |
"Psychological flooding of this sort is not new, and has been around almost as long as Sigmund Freud. In this particularly crude example, you were flashed more frames per second of Shaddam than you had been flashed frames per month of President Hussein when he was still visibly present in Iraq. This sheer weight of numbers then forces your brain to accept Shaddam as President Hussein, even though you may be deeply skeptical. Once you realize what has been done to you, unraveling the illusion becomes easier, because behavioral psychology in itself is merely a series of manufactured stage tricks."
All of the story.
|
|
|
| |
| A look inside the earthly Borg. |
| 07.07.04 (1:03 pm) [edit] |
"The organization will inherently attack other people. A power-based organization, which is all but a rare few organizations, cannot exist without an enemy. The organization need attack only one person, and the organization without an individual mind to synthesize all the related data, will then have an opponent with a human mind. The organization without a mind can therefore never win against a human mind, and will only play out an identified and precisely itemized process before it eventually defeats itself. It is immaterial to a thinking person that an organization can achieve many temporary illusions, and provide for the material wealth of many fools, all of which will collapse, in sum for only the ancient lesson illuminating that for which a thinking person obviously would not want to waste his life. Within the social functioning of the human species, any human mind will win a game against an artificial person without a mind. Do not be hasty in your suggestion of any exceptions. The process will primarily be that of the organization without a mind, inherently defeating itself for physical lack of ability to synthesize all the otherwise easily synthesized organizational contradictions. Do not be hasty with your claims of organizations winning proverbial battles. Their proverbial wars are doomed, as consistently proven."
The rest of the article.
|
|
|
| |
| Are you hip? |
| 07.07.04 (5:52 am) [edit] |
"They think they're hip," the entertainer said. "They can't read; they can't write. They're laughing and giggling, and they're going nowhere."
And Cosby thinks it's just a "black" thing? I got two of 'em in my house...and they aren't black. What he didn't say is they aren't interested in thinking, only feeling.
What am I doing about it?
Leading solely by example. What else is there that can be done with dummies who don't listen?
Why do most of us have to learn the hard way?
Isn't it probably the fault of the teachers, whoever they are at any given moment?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/07/01/cosby.comments.ap/index.html" title="http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/07/01/cosby.comments.ap/index.html" target="_blank"http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/07...
|
|
|
| |
| Strange crop circle. |
| 07.06.04 (9:52 am) [edit] |
Strange indeed. Very strange.
Tesla was thought to have talked to aliens. _________________________ ___
"But according to experts, the giant circles are not supposed to be footballs, instead this pattern apparently represents a diagram of an electrical transistor designed 100 years ago by the world's most mysterious inventor."
(read more to see photos)
|
|
|
| |
| Something very different this way comes. |
| 07.06.04 (4:48 am) [edit] |
This appears to be a different approach to the magnetic power motor I posted earlier.
Will someone please state a new law concerning magnetics that explains this?
They say ideas whose time has come pop up in various locations at the same time, with no apparent connection between the people discovering them.
Hmmmm. _________________________ _______
"All-magnet motor poised to be first to reach market. German manufacturer licensed to manufacture 20 kw unit for Europe and Russia.
JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA (PRWEB) July 2, 2004 - - For centuries, inventors have been claiming to come up with magnetic motor designs that use nothing more than the power of permanent magnets for the motive force; and for the same amount of time, mainstream science has responded that this is impossible. 'It has been proven mathematically that no combination of permanent magnets in any arrangement will generate power.' {1}
History tells us that what has been proven in many people's back yards and garages does not always coincide with mathematics.
Refusing to be daunted by what he considers to be petty dogmas of academic science, inventor Michael J. Brady of Johannesburg not only claims to have produced such a device, but reports that his company, Perendev Power Developments Pty (Ltd) is now in process of manufacturing it on a large scale for markets in Europe, Russia, and Australia."
Full story with videos.
|
|
|
| |
| Insanity reigns |
| 07.05.04 (8:07 pm) [edit] |
Excerpted from the link below:
"Sadly, that conclusion was validated last week by the widespread, coordinated attacks by the Iraqi resistance-attacks that brought Vietnam to mind and, specifically, the country-wide 'Tet' offensive by Communist forces in early 1968 that made Walter Cronkite and many other Americans realize we had all been badly misled into thinking that that war was winnable.
So, war is good if it's winnable, IOW if I just decide I can kick somebody's ass and win, it was a justifiable fight?
What the fuck?!!!!!!!
Somewhere along the line a bunch of Amurikans and dick-head Walter lost their sense of justice.
Since when do you walk down the street and pick fights just because you can win? What is it with this World Bully shit? Whatever happened to fighting only in self-defense? Why not take lessons from the Swiss? They've been successful and haven't been attacked because they don't antagonize anyone.
The final week of formal US occupation of Iraq was a bad one. And the last thing the Bush administration needed was publication of the challenging judgments of a CIA analyst who devoted 17 years to tracking al-Qaeda and other terrorists. That analyst (let's call him Mike) wrote that the Iraqi adventure was 'an unprovoked war against a foe who posed no immediate threat.' He emphasized, 'There is nothing that bin Laden could have hoped for more than the American invasion and occupation of Iraq.'
True..and dumbshit Amurikans played right into bin Laden's hands. Who has control in this scenario?
Mike added that the US has 'waged two failed half-wars and, in doing so, left Afghanistan and Iraq seething with anti-US sentiment, fertile grounds for the expansion of al-Qaeda and kindred groups.'"
Again, "failed half-wars"? Isn't this guy implying that America shoulda turned the Afgan and Iraqi soil into melted glass along with those folks just minding their own business? If someone doesn't agree with ya, nuke 'em?
http://www.counterpunch.org/mcgovern06292004.html" title="http://www.counterpunch.org/mcgovern06292004.html" target="_blank"http://www.counterpunch.org/m...
|
|
|
| |
| How to Serve Man |
| 07.05.04 (4:54 pm) [edit] |
"It stands to reason that where there's sacrifice, there's someone collecting sacrificial offerings. Where there's service, there's someone being served. The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters. And intends to be the master." --Ayn Rand
This reminded me of an old Rod Serling Twilight Zone episode from the original TV series where you see folks happily getting on an alien spacecraft. The aliens are displaying a book entitled How to Serve Man. Then one guy opens the book to find out it's a cook book.
|
|
|
| |
| A small piece of the puzzle in the Death of Power. |
| 07.05.04 (11:48 am) [edit] |
"In the area of human intelligence, the committee said the CIA 'continues down a road leading over a proverbial cliff' because of its failure to improve.
'There is a dysfunctional denial of any need for corrective action,' the report added.
"Dysfunctional", my ass. It is the nature of all adherents to an institution to defend its existence at all costs and from all outside criticism. It spends more energy doing this than it does anything else.
Tenet fired back in a letter to House Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Porter Goss, R- Fla., calling the criticism 'absurd' and 'ill- formed.'
Aren't the first three rules of Spookdom, spouses fucking around and all power junkies for that matter:
1-Deny.
2-Deny.
3-Deny?
'I am deeply disappointed at the way the report has chosen to question the leadership and capabilities of the clandestine service,' Tenet wrote to Goss, who is often mentioned as a likely candidate for the top CIA post.
Do I see a tear in Herr Tenet's eye?
'Dysfunctional organizations do not perform the way the directorate of operations performed in Afghanistan and in support of the military in Iraq before and after the conflict.'"
Full story.
|
|
|
| |
| A Controller Extraordinaire |
| 07.04.04 (12:19 pm) [edit] |
"The history of literature preserves the names and sometimes also the writings of powerless dreamers who took pleasure in contriving plans for an earthly paradise. The common characteristic of all these schemes was that the inmates of the proposed utopia were destined to be unconditionally subject to the orders first of its founder and later of his successors. What the utopias envisioned were in fact all-embracing prisons. Perhaps one can excuse some of their authors as psychopaths."
Why not just call 'em assholes and be done with it?
Money, Method and the Market Process, Chapter 16, 1967, by Ludwig von Mises.
|
|
|
| |
| How do you exercise your power? |
| 07.03.04 (4:31 pm) [edit] |
"When watching men of power in action it must be always kept in mind that, whether they know it or not, their main purpose is the elimination or neutralization of the independent individual- the independent voter, consumer, worker, owner, thinker- and that every device they employ aims at turning men into a manipulable 'animated instrument' which is Aristotle's definition of a slave." -- Eric Hoffer _____________________
I have a beef with Eric on his inclusion of "independent voter" with the rest of the folks there.
Isn't an independent voter a contradiction in terms, believing that his man, once in power will make other people conform to the image that he, the voter, prefers? What's independent about that? Isn't the voter attempting to use a man of power to get what he wants no matter who he votes for? And then doesn't he--by default--support and join the men of power? How is that being independent?
Do you see the contradiction?
Now forget about the idea that voting for second-hand power over another person just minding his own business is a fucked idea in a civilized world, look at the futility of being an independent voter by checking out the article On Escaping Democracy at the link below.
http://www.fredoneverything.net/FOE_Frame_Column.htm" title="http://www.fredoneverything.net/FOE_Frame_Column.htm" target="_blank"http://www.fredoneverything.n...
|
|
|
| |
| More on the shriveling Cosmic Nipple. |
| 07.03.04 (9:49 am) [edit] |
So, you think everything is just fine and your government is running tried and true?
But isn't this ominous?
What happens when SS runs outta money?
Which other agencies might soon follow or is SS just an isolated case?
Found on a forum: [link below] _________________________ __________
"Here's something else that's really encouraging (true story):
I'm defending a fairly complex claim and had to get the plaintiff's records from the Social Security Administration. I got the required release form and sent it in. I got a call today saying that I could come down and copy the records, because they don't have the money to hire someone to copy records. Oh, and I need to bring my own copy paper, too."
http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=1022214" title="http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=1022214" target="_blank"http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fa...
|
|
|
| |
| Are you searching for a kinder, gentler power? |
| 07.02.04 (7:11 pm) [edit] |
LA WEEKLY:
"But American history didn’t begin on January 20, 2001, or on 9/11. Isn’t much of what you describe a situation that dates back a full century or more? Why blame so much of this on George W. Bush?"
...a full century or more? Let's look closer.
What is the nature of power?
Was there ever a kinder, gentler power or was it just hidden from your view until Dubya hit the scene?
CHALMERS JOHNSON:
"Yes, this goes back a long way — to Teddy Roosevelt acquiring colonies from the Spanish. But Bush dropped the mask. He comes out and says we are a New Rome, we don’t need the U.N. or any friends. We now put countries on hit lists. Certainly, if there were some steering committee for an American imperial project, it would consider Bill Clinton a much better imperial president than George W. Bush. It’s always better strategy to not show your hand, to take an indirect approach but to know exactly where you are going." [My emphasis]
So, is it better to engage in lies, conspiracies and cover-ups in this card game with lives at stake? Doesn't that sound like a typical response by a power junkie?
If future historians have anything good to say about Dubya, might they say that what he did for America was to show it the raw face of power so Americans truly saw what it looked like?
The full story.
|
|
|
| |
| Do you really want to polish a turd? |
| 07.02.04 (1:00 pm) [edit] |
Isn't "reforming" or "re-inventing" government like trying to polish a turd?
And doesn't the same hold true for an ol' fashioned revolution?
Why not just let it die a natural death?
Do you really think Your Guy will make all The Bad Things go away?
How would you go about "reforming" an institution whose sole interest -- its raison d'etre -- is having you obey its dictates without question?
Don't we need a revolution in our way of thinking about something in order to change it permanently?
"But to tear down a factory or revolt against a government or avoid repair of a motorcycle because it is a system is to attack effects rather than causes; and as long as the attack is upon effects only, no change is possible. The true system, the real system, is our present construction of systematic thought itself, rationality itself, and if a factory is torn down but the rationality which produced it is left standing, then that rationality will simply produce another factory. If a revolution destroys a systematic government, but the systematic pattern of thought that produced that government are left intact, then those patterns will repeat themselves in the succeeding government. There's so much talk about the system. And so little understanding." --Robert Pirsig in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.
Can you get it right thi | |